Every category where a model named Workday Adaptive Planning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	24 of 103	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workday Adaptive Planning yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workday Adaptive Planning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Need enterprise-wide connected planning? → Anaplan or Workday Adaptive Planning” Mistral Small · Territory planning · comparative prompt · first choice

“suits organizations already on Workday that want sales planning tied to workforce and headcount data” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Territory planning · comparative prompt · alternative

“→ Anaplan or Workday Adaptive Planning” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Territory planning · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for finance-led planning” Llama 4 Maverick · Territory planning · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Not really a territory-first tool ... Steep learning curve and complexity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workday Adaptive Planning, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Adaptive Planning was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan27 of 296Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ23 of 297Not in the top three

Varicent23 of 296Not in the top three

Fullcast22 of 292Not in the top three

Salesforce Maps19 of 291Not in the top three

eSpatial14 of 290Not in the top three

Maptive12 of 290Not in the top three

QuotaPath11 of 291Not in the top three

Xactly8 of 290Not in the top three

ZoomInfo7 of 290Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Adaptive Planning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 29 answers that named Workday Adaptive Planning and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

articsledge.com3

bitscale.ai3

captivateiq.com3

lative.ai3

pipeline.zoominfo.com3

boogieboard.ai2

gitnux.org2

guideflow.com2

salesmotion.io2

varicent.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Workday Adaptive Planning came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

articsledge.com/post/territory-planning-software3

bitscale.ai/blogs/best-territory-planning-tools3

captivateiq.com/blog/territory-planning-software-20263

lative.ai/blog/sales-territory-planning-software3

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/sales-territory-management-software3

gitnux.org/best/sales-territory-design-software2

gitnux.org/best/sales-territory-planning-software2

gitnux.org/best/territory-planning-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Workday, Inc. is the company behind Workday Adaptive Planning.

Website: workday.com
Headquarters: Pleasanton, United States
Founded: 2005
Employees: about 20,000 (2025)
Ownership: Public, WDAY on Nasdaq

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Adaptive Planning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Adaptive Planning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.