Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 109 → 87 of 94
2 categories · RankedWorkday Adaptive Planning
22Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Territory planning for enterprise buyers
Rank 36 of 123 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business96 of 103
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market36 of 123
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise18 of 92
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workday Adaptive Planning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 36 of 123 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Marketing resource management | Marketing | 0% | 62 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workday Adaptive Planning held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Territory planning · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 36 of 116
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 17 of 83
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 36 of 123 |
| Marketing resource mgt | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 110, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workday Adaptive Planning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workday Adaptive Planning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative8 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The top territory and quota planning tools are: 1. Workday Adaptive Planning” Llama 4 Maverick · Territory planning · comparative prompt · first choice
“Workday Adaptive is best for organizations prioritizing financial integration and scenario planning.” Mistral Small · Territory planning · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for finance-heavy planning: Workday Adaptive Planning” GPT-5.4 mini · Marketing resource mgt · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“can take time to fully understand and configure, especially for new users, with some advanced features requiring a learning curve” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Territory planning · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Adaptive Planning, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Adaptive Planning was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Adaptive Planning, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Adaptive Planning was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Adaptive Planning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Workday Adaptive Planning and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pipeline.zoominfo.com20
captivateiq.com18
guideflow.com18
worldmetrics.org12
zipdo.co9
anaplan.com8
espatial.com8
varicent.com8
articsledge.com7
prospeo.io7
115 of the 115 domain citations in answers naming Workday Adaptive Planning came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
workday.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Workday Adaptive Planning takes 0% of first choices and CaptivateIQ Planning takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
workday.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Workday Adaptive Planning takes 0% of first choices and CaptivateIQ Planning takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales territory and quota planning tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales territory and quota planning tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“workday adaptive planning”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 57 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,213,450 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 69,259 · 7,130 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 28,599
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 36 of 123 in territory planning
Segment leader
36%
CaptivateIQ Planning
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 22 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 22 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on workday.com
11,325
subdomains included
Content
4,000
counted in the table below
Documentation
7
Product · Integration
1,116 · 59
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 2,489 | 0 | 2026-02-26 | ||
| Blog | 1,125 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 117 | 3 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 84 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 50 | 0 | 2025-06-18 | ||
| Comparison | 46 | 1 | 2026-07-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 43 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | ||
| Conference or event | 18 | 0 | 2026-06-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 16 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| News or press | 12 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Create audit readiness checklist template or tool
- 2026-08-31Create audit readiness checklist template or tool
- 2026-07-30Future work podcast helen tupper squiggly careers podcast or video
- 2026-07-29Future work podcast copy paste economy podcast or video
- 2026-07-29Future work podcast copy paste economy podcast or video
- 2026-07-02Lawless ai vs true transformation comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page workday.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Workday Adaptive Planning
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workday, Inc. is the company behind Workday Adaptive Planning.ShowHide
The company
Workday, Inc. is the company behind Workday Adaptive Planning.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- workday.com
- Headquarters
- Pleasanton, United States
- Founded
- 2005
- Employees
- about 20,000 (2025)
- Ownership
- Public, WDAY on Nasdaq
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- EPM-Software
- For
- Enterprise and mid-market organizations
- Price stated
- Prijzen variëren workday.com/nl-nl/products/adaptive-planning/pricing.html
- Free plan or trial
- Kostenloser Probemonat workday.com/de-de/pages/cb/workday-adaptive-planning.html
- Certifications
- ISO 42001-afstemming
- Customers named
- Scout24HubSpotMan GroupCumulusKindred at HomeBoston ScientificTX Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What Workday Adaptive Planning's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workday.com/de-de/pages/cb/workday-adaptive-planning.html, workday.com/nl-nl/products/adaptive-planning/pricing.html, workday.com/nl-nl/products/adaptive-planning/overview.html, workday.com/nl-nl/products/adaptive-planning/technology.html, workday.com/nl-nl/products/adaptive-planning/ai-for-fpa.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Adaptive Planning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Adaptive Planning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday Adaptive Planning by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workday Adaptive Planning is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday Adaptive Planning, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.