Index › Vendors › SAP Territory and Quota · September 2026 Edition

SAP · 1 category · Named, not ranked

SAP Territory and Quota

13Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP Territory and Quota was named 2 times in Territory planning, where CaptivateIQ led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business97 of 121

under the label threshold

Mid-market42 of 103

under the label threshold

Enterprise14 of 85

under the label threshold

In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP Territory and Quota for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	42 of 103	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP Territory and Quota yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP Territory and Quota across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Need AI-driven optimization? → SAP Territory and Quota” Mistral Small · Territory planning · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP Territory and Quota, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Territory and Quota was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan11 of 136Not in the top three

Fullcast8 of 130Not in the top three

Varicent6 of 133Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ6 of 132Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning6 of 131Not in the top three

Salesforce Maps5 of 130Not in the top three

Maptive4 of 130Not in the top three

eSpatial4 of 130Not in the top three

Badger Maps3 of 131Not in the top three

QuotaPath3 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Territory and Quota. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 13 answers that named SAP Territory and Quota and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

anaplan.com3

articsledge.com3

captivateiq.com3

gitnux.org3

guideflow.com3

lative.ai3

pipeline.zoominfo.com3

sap.com3

varicent.com3

worldmetrics.org3

No domain is on file for SAP Territory and Quota, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

anaplan.com/solutions/territory-planning-and-management3

articsledge.com/post/territory-planning-software3

captivateiq.com/blog/territory-planning-software-20263

guideflow.com/blog/territory-planning-software3

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/sales-territory-management-software3

sap.com/products/crm/territory-and-quota.html3

bitscale.ai/blogs/best-territory-planning-tools2

guideflow.com/blog/sales-territory-management-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

SAP is the company behind SAP Territory and Quota.

Website: sap.com
Headquarters: Walldorf, Germany
Founded: 1972
Employees: about 106,043 (2023)
Ownership: Public, SAP on Italian Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Territory and Quota's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Territory and Quota, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.