2 categories · Named, not rankedPigment
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 4% | 8 of 103 | 38% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30% |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 74 of 75 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 20% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Modern GTM / Connected Planning Platforms (Highly Recommended): Examples: Pigment, Fullcast, or Abacum” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · scale prompt · first choice
“Top Pick for Broader Business Planning: Pigment” Kimi K2 · Territory planning · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Pigment (modern/agile) or Anaplan (large enterprise).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · comparative prompt · alternative
“Pigment is the leading modern alternative to legacy tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Pigment — Good connected planning, but more enterprise-oriented.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · direct prompt · hard negative
“Pigment \u2014 $50K+/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue intel · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise-level tools (like Anaplan, Varicent, or Pigment) handle both but cost tens of thousands of dollars” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise planning (Anaplan, Pigment) | ~$50–150K+/yr | 3–6 months, heavy build” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 21 answers that named Pigment and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Twelve of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Pigment came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pigment's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pigment, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pigment.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.