| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | Revenue operations | 2% | 4 of 64 | 0% | 23 | accepted challenger | ▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 3%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 2% | 16 of 123 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 17 of 111 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 19 of 94 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% | |
| Partner relationship management | Partner and channel | 0% | 27 of 61 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerPortal.io at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 34 of 72 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 0% | 51 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 79 of 116 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory planning | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 16 of 123 |
| Sales enablement | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 34 of 72 |
| CRM | 2% | 3% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 3%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 4 of 64 |
| Lead routing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 17 of 111 |
| Field sales | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 19 of 94, unchanged |
| PRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 27 of 61 |
| Sales engagement | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 66, unchanged |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 79 of 116, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For Most Companies: Freshsales at $15/user/month offers the best combination of territory planning, quota management, and CRM features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Territory planning · budget prompt · first choice
“HubSpot CRM or Freshsales are excellent starting points due to their balance of features, ease of use, and scalability” Mistral Small · CRM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“highly rated for mid-market teams looking for a fast, modern setup that is more budget-friendly than HubSpot” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CRM · direct prompt · alternative
“Freshsales (free for 3 users, ~$9/mo after) is a close third with AI lead scoring but fewer field mentions” Grok 4.20 · Field sales · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Users report various bugs and glitches, convoluted interface, and it's not ideal for enterprise-level organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 110 of the 124 answers that named Freshsales and are not a share of its labels.
225 of the 225 domain citations in answers naming Freshsales came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 258 | 54 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 165 | 7 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| News or press | 162 | 18 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Comparison | 107 | 4 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 64 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Blog | 63 | 5 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 30 | 3 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 23 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 18 | 0 | 2026-01-07 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-24 |
As the event pages on freshworks.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page freshworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
What Freshsales's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: freshworks.com, freshworks.com/pricing, trust.freshworks.com, freshworks.com/products, freshworks.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Freshsales's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Freshsales, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Freshsales by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: