| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | Revenue operations | 0% | 12 of 64 | 6% | 36 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 43 of 94 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% | |
| Order management systems | Revenue operations | 0% | 32 of 131 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Inventory at 25% | |
| Partner relationship management | Partner and channel | 0% | 20 of 61 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerPortal.io at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 47 of 123 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Customer support and helpdesk | Customer | 0% | 44 of 55 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zendesk Support Suite at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Product information management | Revenue operations | 0% | 62 of 68 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Plytix at 34% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 12 of 64 |
| Field sales | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 43 of 94, unchanged |
| Order management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 131, unchanged |
| PRM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 20 of 61, unchanged |
| Territory planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 123, unchanged |
| Helpdesk | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 44 of 55, unchanged |
| PIM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 68, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you're distribution/manufacturing-heavy and care most about ERP depth: Microsoft Dynamics 365 / Acumatica / Epicor-style stacks are often better fits” GPT-5.4 mini · Order management · direct prompt · alternative
“If your company runs almost exclusively on Windows, Outlook, and Excel, Microsoft Dynamics is often the smartest choice.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM · direct prompt · alternative
“Dynamics 365 Sales - a CRM solution that offers a range of features including sales pipeline management and automation.” Llama 4 Maverick · CRM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Offers an Intelligent Order Management component that handles order orchestration, fulfillment, and lifecycle processes” Llama 4 Maverick · Order management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“The "ERP-as-a-PIM" Trap (e.g., trying to use SAP, NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PIM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Standard mobile applications for giant legacy CRMs (such as Salesforce or Microsoft Dynamics) without highly customized, field-specific setups.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Field sales · negative prompt · soft negative
“the interface is often criticized for being cluttered and difficult to navigate, leading to low user adoption” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CRM · negative prompt · soft negative
“They are over-engineered for most non-technical companies. The learning curve is steep” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 144 of the 171 answers that named Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales and are not a share of its labels.
250 of the 250 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: microsoft.com/de-de/dynamics-365/products/sales, microsoft.com/es-es/dynamics-365/products/sales, microsoft.com/fi-fi/dynamics-365/products/sales, microsoft.com/fr-fr/dynamics-365/products/sales, microsoft.com/hu-hu/dynamics-365/products/sales. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: