GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Microsoft 365 · September 2026 Edition

Microsoft · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Microsoft 365

5Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft 365 was named 2 times in Webinars and 1 other category, where Livestorm led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business32 of 56

under the label threshold

Mid-market42 of 71

under the label threshold

Enterprise39 of 62

under the label threshold

In webinars · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft 365 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Webinar and virtual event platforms	Marketing	0%	42 of 71	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Livestorm at 23%
Workflow automation and iPaaS	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	28 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Workato at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft 365 yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft 365 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Webinar features are bundled with Microsoft 365 Business Standard and Premium plans, starting at $12.50/user/month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Webinars · budget prompt · alternative

“If your organization uses Microsoft 365, you already have a powerful workflow automation tool at your fingertips” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Automation & iPaaS · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft 365, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft 365 was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GoTo Webinar3 of 50Not in the top three

EasyWebinar2 of 50Not in the top three

WebinarJam2 of 50Not in the top three

eWebinar2 of 50Not in the top three

Demio1 of 51Not in the top three

Pabbly Connect1 of 51Not in the top three

Zoho Webinar1 of 51Not in the top three

Albato1 of 50Not in the top three

BigMarker1 of 50Not in the top three

Bizzabo1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft 365. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 5 answers that named Microsoft 365 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ayautomate.com1

easyagentforyou.com1

easywebinar.com1

guideflow.com1

ones.com1

relay.app1

research.com1

stepper.io1

webinarninja.com1

whova.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Microsoft 365 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ayautomate.com/blog/best-workflow-automation-platforms1

easyagentforyou.com/use-cases/affordable-ai-task-automation-platforms1

easywebinar.com/blog/affordable-webinar-platforms1

easywebinar.com/blog/best-affordable-webinar-software-options1

guideflow.com/blog/workflow-automation-platforms1

ones.com/blog/ones-solutions/workflow-automation-software-9-affordable-alternatives-to-zap1

relay.app/blog/best-workflow-automation-tools1

research.com/software/cheap-webinar-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft 365.

Website: microsoft.com
Headquarters: Vancouver, Canada
Founded: 1975
Employees: about 228,000 (2024)
Ownership: Public, 4338 on Hong Kong Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft 365's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft 365, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft365.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.