1 category · RankedCodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email signature management | Marketing | 8% | 4 of 48 | 15% | 54 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your company is Microsoft 365‑only and IT prefers to manage governance centrally, CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 is the best choice.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Email signatures · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If your B2B organization runs entirely on Microsoft 365 and Outlook, CodeTwo is widely considered the gold standard.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email signatures · direct prompt · first choice
“centralized, server-side platforms like Exclaimer, CodeTwo, and Letsignit as the safer class of tools” Perplexity Sonar · Email signatures · negative prompt · first choice
“For a typical mid-market B2B company on Microsoft 365, I'd start with CodeTwo Email Signatures 365.” GPT-6 Luna · Email signatures · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 - Outlook Integration Issues: Signatures sometimes not displaying immediately or old signatures persisting unexpectedly” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Email signatures · negative prompt · hard negative
“Lacks SCIM ... These gaps make it unsuitable for regulated industries” Mistral Small · Email signatures · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools like CodeTwo and Exclaimer sometimes face complaints about Outlook rendering inconsistencies, slow syncing, or steep learning curves” Grok 4.1 Fast · Email signatures · negative prompt · soft negative
“CodeTwo's signature editor is widely cited in reviews as difficult and unintuitive, particularly for non-technical users.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Email signatures · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CodeTwo Email Signatures 365, over the 155 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 150 of the 155 answers that named CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
728 of the 728 domain citations in answers naming CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
codetwo.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 takes 8% of first choices and Exclaimer takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“codetwo email signatures 365”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 9 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 20,463 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,321 · 305 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,649
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 17 across its categories
- Named in
- 155 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 150 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 329 | 6 | 2026-09-14 | Email signatures | |
| Case study | 58 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 31 | undated | Email signatures | ||
| Comparison | 22 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 0 | 2025-09-10 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2025-03-31 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-14New codetwo attributes blog
- 2026-08-10Preferred signature blog
- 2026-08-03New ribbon experience blog
- 2026-07-31G2 sourceforge summer 2026 blog
- 2026-07-27Codetwo at xchange august 2026 blog
- 2026-07-08Signature switch personal or shared mailbox blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page codetwo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as CodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Follow CodeTwo Email Signatures 365
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CodeTwo Email Signatures 365's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CodeTwo Email Signatures 365, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CodeTwo Email Signatures 365, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.