Every category where a model named SyncSignature for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Email signature management	Marketing	4%	6 of 48	0%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SyncSignature yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SyncSignature across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	2	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels2

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative16 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained14 labels3

Scale-constrained10 labels3

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-market B2B companies, SyncSignature offers the best value proposition with competitive pricing, robust features, and flexible deployment options.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Email signatures · direct prompt · first choice

“SyncSignature | Balance of features and cost | Competitive mid-market” Kimi K2 · Email signatures · scale prompt · first choice

“worth a look if you want directory sync and multi-tenant management in a simpler centralized model” GPT-5.4 mini · Email signatures · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“a free forever plan with professional templates and one-click auto-deployment” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email signatures · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SyncSignature, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SyncSignature was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

WiseStamp42 of 498Compare →

Exclaimer40 of 4912Compare →

CodeTwo Email Signatures 36535 of 494Compare →

Newoldstamp22 of 490Compare →

Signitic20 of 494Compare →

MySignature17 of 492Compare →

Letsignit12 of 490Not among the top eight

BulkSignature10 of 492Not among the top eight

Bybrand10 of 491Not among the top eight

Opensense8 of 490Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SyncSignature. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 49 of the 49 answers that named SyncSignature and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

syncsignature.comYour site48

wisestamp.com43

guideflow.com34

mailbutler.io34

newoldstamp.com31

signitic.com23

exclaimer.com19

thecmo.com19

g2.com17

getapp.com15

235 of the 283 domain citations in answers naming SyncSignature came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mailbutler.io/blog/email/email-signature-management-tools34

guideflow.com/blog/best-email-signature-software33

wisestamp.com/32

newoldstamp.com/blog/email-signature-software31

wisestamp.com/guides/best-email-signature-management-software22

syncsignature.com/blog/best-email-signature-management-software21

thecmo.com/tools/best-email-signature-software19

syncsignature.com/email-signature-management14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

syncsignature.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SyncSignature takes 4% of first choices and Exclaimer takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “email signature management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best email signature management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 140 a month (“syncsignature”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 3,624 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,021 · 15 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 737
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 48 in email signatures

Segment leader

33%

Exclaimer

First choices: 8 across its categories
Named in: 49 answers
Its own site cited: in 49 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on syncsignature.com

473

subdomains included

Content

125

counted in the table below

Documentation

131

Product · Integration

0 · 5

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	87	11	2026-10-01	Email signatures
Comparison	30	1	2026-07-08	Email signatures
Case study	6	undated
Glossary or explainer	2	undated

Most recent

2026-10-01How to run email signature banner campaigns blog
2026-08-17Hris syncs directory but not email signatures blog
2026-08-17Bamboohr email signature management blog
2026-08-17Zoho people email signature management blog
2026-08-17Greythr email signature management blog
2026-08-17Hr software google workspace employee sync blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page syncsignature.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow SyncSignature

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SyncSignature's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SyncSignature, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SyncSignature by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SyncSignature is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SyncSignature, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.