Every category where a model named Newoldstamp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Email signature management	Marketing	2%	8 of 48	5%	22	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Newoldstamp yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Newoldstamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	3	0	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels2

Paraphrase7 labels2

Comparative22 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative64 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Newoldstamp is the best overall email signature management platform for teams who want to combine administrative simplicity with marketing campaigns” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email signatures · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Newoldstamp is a cloud-based signature manager built specifically around signature marketing and departmental customization.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email signatures · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Newoldstamp is worth considering if marketing team control and integrations with systems like ... matter most” Perplexity Sonar · Email signatures · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Focuses on centralized signature deployment plus branded campaigns and consistency across the company.” Perplexity Sonar · Email signatures · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Free tiers (e.g., some in Newoldstamp or MySignature) often limit features, leading to unexpected upgrades.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Email signatures · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Newoldstamp, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Newoldstamp was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

WiseStamp54 of 6420Compare →

Exclaimer50 of 6418Compare →

CodeTwo Email Signatures 36543 of 645Compare →

MySignature35 of 645Compare →

Signitic29 of 647Compare →

SyncSignature22 of 647Compare →

Bybrand13 of 642Not among the top eight

BulkSignature11 of 640Not among the top eight

Letsignit11 of 640Not among the top eight

Rocketseed10 of 640Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Newoldstamp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 64 of the 64 answers that named Newoldstamp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wisestamp.com56

newoldstamp.comYour site52

guideflow.com43

mailbutler.io43

thecmo.com40

syncsignature.com36

signitic.com32

capterra.com24

g2.com24

exclaimer.com22

320 of the 372 domain citations in answers naming Newoldstamp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

newoldstamp.com/blog/email-signature-software51

mailbutler.io/blog/email/email-signature-management-tools43

guideflow.com/blog/best-email-signature-software42

thecmo.com/tools/best-email-signature-software40

wisestamp.com/guides/best-email-signature-management-software37

wisestamp.com/32

signitic.com/en/resources/the-ultimate-guide-to-email-signature-software-in-202524

textexpander.com/blog/best-email-signature-managers21

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

newoldstamp.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Newoldstamp takes 2% of first choices and Exclaimer takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “email signature management tool”

Position for “best email signature management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 480 a month (“newoldstamp”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 30,419 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 6,108 · 372 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 4,757
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

11 ads · 11 text · 11 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2022, as Newoldstamp Inc, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 8 of 48 in email signatures

Segment leader

33%

Exclaimer

First choices: 5 across its categories
Named in: 64 answers
Its own site cited: in 64 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on newoldstamp.com

389

subdomains included

Content

279

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

12 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	255	3	2026-09-14	Email signatures, SEO
Comparison	14	0	2026-01-05
Report or ebook	5	0	2018-12-11
Conference or event	2	0	2019-10-22
Template or tool	2	undated
Glossary or explainer	1	0	2025-05-19

Most recent

2026-09-14Page 5 blog
2026-07-26Create gmail mobile signature blog
2026-07-15Email signature software blog
2026-06-26Adding images to apple mail signatures quick fixes blog
2026-06-24Professional email signature and address blog
2026-06-23Yahoo email signature image blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page newoldstamp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Newoldstamp

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Newoldstamp; a claim can dispute any of them.

NewOldStamp 3NEWOLDSTAMP 1

Follow Newoldstamp

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Newoldstamp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Newoldstamp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Newoldstamp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Newoldstamp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Newoldstamp, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.