Signitic vs Newoldstamp
Zero of fourteen models named Signitic first on the direct prompt; zero named Newoldstamp. Signitic was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Newoldstamp by twelve and Signitic carries 24 labels and Newoldstamp 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the email signature management page.
By framing
SigniticFirst choices, of fourteen modelsNewoldstamp
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Signitic and Newoldstamp were named in the same answer twenty-nine times, of the 60 answers naming Signitic and the 64 naming Newoldstamp. In those answers Newoldstamp took the first choice zero times and Signitic seven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Signitic Newoldstamp first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Signitic on the left and Newoldstamp on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Signitic11%#3 of 9Newoldstamp7%#5 of 9Signitic14%#3 of 9Newoldstamp2%#6 of 9Signitic0%#– of 7Newoldstamp0%#– of 7What the models said about Signitic
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Top Recommendation: Signitic ... This is the strongest choice for a company on a limited budget.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Signitic stands out as the best email signature management tool for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“The best email signature management tool for a company with a limited budget is Signitic” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Newoldstamp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Free tiers (e.g., some in Newoldstamp or MySignature) often limit features, leading to unexpected upgrades.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Newoldstamp is the best overall email signature management platform for teams who want to combine administrative simplicity with marketing campaigns” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Newoldstamp is a cloud-based signature manager built specifically around signature marketing and departmental customization.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Newoldstamp is worth considering if marketing team control and integrations with systems like ... matter most” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.