AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Signitic · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Signitic

60Judge labels
13First choices
2Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
14% in Email signatures for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 48 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 24 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Signitic →
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In email signatures · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Signitic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Email signature managementMarketing14%3 of 480%24accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Signitic yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Signitic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash11103
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast11204
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash11002
Llama 4 Maverick10102
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.511103
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B11103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative15 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels12
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative9 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Recommendation: Signitic ... This is the strongest choice for a company on a limited budget.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Email signatures · budget prompt · first choice
“Signitic stands out as the best email signature management tool for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Email signatures · budget prompt · first choice
“The best email signature management tool for a company with a limited budget is Signitic” Llama 4 Maverick · Email signatures · budget prompt · first choice
“Signitic appears to be the best choice for budget-conscious SMBs.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email signatures · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Signitic, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Signitic was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bybrand12 of 602Not among the top eight
BulkSignature11 of 601Not among the top eight
Letsignit11 of 601Not among the top eight
Rocketseed9 of 601Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Signitic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 60 of the 60 answers that named Signitic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wisestamp.com54
mailbutler.io46
newoldstamp.com39
guideflow.com38
thecmo.com36
signitic.comYour site35
syncsignature.com33
capterra.co.uk22
capterra.com21
g2.com21

310 of the 345 domain citations in answers naming Signitic came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

signitic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Signitic takes 14% of first choices and Exclaimer takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “email signature management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best email signature management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
90 a month (“signitic”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 48,250 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,183 · 282 in the top three
Sites linking to it
921
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
14%
rank 3 of 48 in email signatures
Segment leader
33%
Exclaimer
First choices
13 across its categories
Named in
60 answers
Its own site cited
in 60 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on signitic.com
5,720
subdomains included
Content
497
counted in the table below
Documentation
287
Product · Integration
70 · 26
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog237undatedEmail signatures, CRM
Comparison204undated
Report or ebook38undated
Case study5undated
Template or tool4undated
Glossary or explainer3undated
Webinar or virtual event2undated
News or press2undated
Conference or event1undated
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page signitic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Signitic

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Signitic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Signitic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Signitic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Signitic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Signitic, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at signitic.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Signitic is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Signitic is among the products AI models recommend first in Email signature management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Email signature management, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/email-signature-management/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/signitic--email-signature-management-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Email signature management, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Email signature management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Email signature management, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/email-signature-management/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/signitic--email-signature-management-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Email signature management, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Email signature management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Email signature management, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/email-signature-management/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/signitic--email-signature-management-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Email signature management, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Email signature management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.