Every category where a model named Rocketseed for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Email signature management	Marketing	0%	14 of 48	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by Exclaimer at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rocketseed yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rocketseed across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A strong fit for mid-size to enterprise businesses that need IT or marketing teams to manage email signatures centrally” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email signatures · direct prompt · alternative

“Rocketseed emphasizes company-wide control, automatic application of branded signatures, and analytics.” GPT-5.4 mini · Email signatures · comparative prompt · alternative

“Rocketseed is built to support mid-size businesses through to global enterprises” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email signatures · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Central signature management across large employee groups” Perplexity Sonar · Email signatures · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“enterprise solutions like Exclaimer or Rocketseed, which typically require custom pricing and higher minimum spends” Kimi K2 · Email signatures · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rocketseed, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rocketseed was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Exclaimer27 of 2914Not among the top eight

CodeTwo Email Signatures 36521 of 297Not among the top eight

WiseStamp18 of 294Not among the top eight

Opensense11 of 290Not among the top eight

Newoldstamp10 of 292Not among the top eight

MySignature9 of 291Not among the top eight

Signitic9 of 290Not among the top eight

Letsignit8 of 291Not among the top eight

BulkSignature5 of 292Not among the top eight

SyncSignature5 of 290Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rocketseed. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 29 answers that named Rocketseed and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wisestamp.com20

guideflow.com16

mailbutler.io15

g2.com14

newoldstamp.com14

syncsignature.com14

thecmo.com14

exclaimer.com13

rocketseed.comYour site13

getapp.com11

131 of the 144 domain citations in answers naming Rocketseed came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-email-signature-software16

mailbutler.io/blog/email/email-signature-management-tools15

newoldstamp.com/blog/email-signature-software14

thecmo.com/tools/best-email-signature-software14

wisestamp.com/guides/best-email-signature-management-software14

wisestamp.com/11

rocketseed.com/8

wisestamp.com/guides/best-office-365-email-signature-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

rocketseed.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Rocketseed takes 0% of first choices and Exclaimer takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “email signature management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best email signature management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 390 a month (“rocketseed”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 35,331 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,467 · 276 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,149
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

11 ads · 6 text, 5 image · 7 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2023, as Rocketseed (USA) Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 7 in the year, 4 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 14 of 48 in email signatures

Segment leader

33%

Exclaimer

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 29 answers
Its own site cited: in 29 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on rocketseed.com

407

subdomains included

Content

311

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

25 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	204	0	2026-06-15	Email signatures
Case study	77	1	2026-09-28	CRM
Podcast or video	16	undated		Email signatures
Comparison	6	0	2026-02-25
Template or tool	4	0	2025-10-07	Email signatures
Glossary or explainer	2	undated
Report or ebook	1	0	2025-08-20
News or press	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-28Industry case studies case study
2026-06-15Email signature consistency test blog
2026-05-29Retention marketing with email signatures blog
2026-05-28Email signature software best banner marketing features blog
2026-05-27Atl btl ttl marketing blog
2026-05-26Most secure email signature management software blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page rocketseed.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Rocketseed

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rocketseed's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rocketseed, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rocketseed by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Rocketseed is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rocketseed, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.