AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › MySignature · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

MySignature

52Judge labels
3First choices
8Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Email signatures for small business buyers
Rank 9 of 48 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of MySignature →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In email signatures · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MySignature for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Email signature managementMarketing2%9 of 487%14accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MySignature yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MySignature across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K211002
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B02002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative19 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels2
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative9 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For the tightest budgets: Start with MySignature's free plan” Kimi K2 · Email signatures · budget prompt · first choice
“MySignature is also designed for small teams and lists a lower-cost team option below $1/user/month in some cases” Perplexity Sonar · Email signatures · budget prompt · alternative
“best for small teams and freelancers who want quick setup without centralized management” Muse Glimmer 30B · Email signatures · comparative prompt · alternative
“Quick setup for individuals and small teams without needing centralized IT management.” Kimi K2 · Email signatures · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Free tiers (e.g., some in Newoldstamp or MySignature) often limit features, leading to unexpected upgrades.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Email signatures · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MySignature, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MySignature was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bybrand13 of 522Not among the top eight
Letsignit10 of 520Not among the top eight
BulkSignature9 of 522Not among the top eight
HubSpot Email Signature Generator9 of 521Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MySignature. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 52 answers that named MySignature and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wisestamp.com45
newoldstamp.com36
guideflow.com35
mailbutler.io32
syncsignature.com30
thecmo.com30
signitic.com20
g2.com17
capterra.com15
techstory.in15

275 of the 275 domain citations in answers naming MySignature came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mysignature.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MySignature takes 2% of first choices and Exclaimer takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “email signature management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best email signature management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“mysignature”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 59,004 a month
Searches its site ranks for
6,527 · 360 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,102
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
11 ads · 11 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2023, as Newoldstamp Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 4 in the year, 7 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 48 in email signatures
Segment leader
33%
Exclaimer
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
52 answers
Its own site cited
in 51 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on mysignature.io
555
subdomains included
Content
249
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog16672026-08-17Email signatures
Comparison5502026-05-20
Conference or event1102025-01-30
Case study9undated
Template or tool4undated
Glossary or explainer402026-04-03
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mysignature.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow MySignature

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MySignature's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MySignature, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MySignature by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where MySignature is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name MySignature, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mysignature.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.