Every category where a model named Bybrand for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Email signature management	Marketing	2%	10 of 48	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Exclaimer at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bybrand yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bybrand across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative6 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Bybrand: $8/month for up to 10 signatures (flat rate)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Email signatures · budget prompt · first choice

“Signitic (~$1/user/month) or Bybrand (~$8/month total for small teams) are the most cost-effective” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Email signatures · budget prompt · alternative

“Bybrand is an excellent alternative to enterprise-heavy tools.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email signatures · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bybrand, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bybrand was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Exclaimer19 of 224Not among the top eight

WiseStamp16 of 227Not among the top eight

CodeTwo Email Signatures 36516 of 221Not among the top eight

MySignature13 of 221Not among the top eight

Newoldstamp13 of 221Not among the top eight

Signitic12 of 222Not among the top eight

SyncSignature10 of 223Not among the top eight

BulkSignature5 of 220Not among the top eight

HubSpot Email Signature Generator4 of 220Not among the top eight

Mailbutler4 of 220Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bybrand. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Bybrand and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wisestamp.com18

mailbutler.io16

newoldstamp.com15

thecmo.com15

syncsignature.com14

guideflow.com12

signitic.com11

gitnux.org8

bybrand.ioYour site7

textexpander.com7

116 of the 123 domain citations in answers naming Bybrand came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mailbutler.io/blog/email/email-signature-management-tools16

thecmo.com/tools/best-email-signature-software15

newoldstamp.com/blog/email-signature-software14

guideflow.com/blog/best-email-signature-software11

wisestamp.com/guides/best-email-signature-management-software10

signitic.com/en/resources/the-ultimate-guide-to-email-signature-software-in-20258

textexpander.com/blog/best-email-signature-managers7

gitnux.org/best/email-signature-management-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

bybrand.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Bybrand takes 2% of first choices and Exclaimer takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “email signature management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best email signature management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 390 a month (“bybrand”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 2 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 4,727 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,385 · 60 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 798
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

12 ads · 11 text, 1 video · 9 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as B S DE CASTRO - INFORMATICA, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 4 in the year, 8 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 10 of 48 in email signatures

Segment leader

33%

Exclaimer

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 22 answers
Its own site cited: in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on bybrand.io

412

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

4 · 10

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	32	5	2026-09-30
Template or tool	18	undated
Comparison	6	2	2026-07-29

Most recent

2026-09-30Updates q3 2026 blog
2026-08-14Outlook addin on mobile blog
2026-08-08For business blog
2026-07-29Newoldstamp alternatives comparison
2026-07-20Exclaimer best alternatives comparison
2026-07-16Enterprise signatures blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page bybrand.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Bybrand

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bybrand's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bybrand, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bybrand by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Bybrand is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bybrand, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.