Every category where a model named Opensense for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Email signature management	Marketing	0%	12 of 48	0%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Opensense yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Opensense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels2

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative16 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your primary goal is to turn employee emails into a highly targeted advertising channel to drive pipeline, Opensense is unmatched.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email signatures · direct prompt · alternative

“OpenSense is the preferred option when ABM and campaign banners are central to the B2B use case.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Email signatures · direct prompt · alternative

“Consider Opensense if signature banners are an important marketing channel” GPT-6 Luna · Email signatures · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“The most marketing-focused platform; treats signatures as a growth/funnel tool” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Email signatures · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Opensense, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Opensense was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Exclaimer37 of 3825Not among the top eight

CodeTwo Email Signatures 36528 of 387Not among the top eight

WiseStamp26 of 3810Not among the top eight

Letsignit13 of 380Not among the top eight

Rocketseed11 of 380Not among the top eight

Signitic9 of 381Not among the top eight

Newoldstamp9 of 380Not among the top eight

SyncSignature8 of 380Not among the top eight

MySignature5 of 380Not among the top eight

Templafy5 of 380Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Opensense. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named Opensense and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wisestamp.com28

syncsignature.com22

mailbutler.io21

guideflow.com20

exclaimer.com17

g2.com17

getapp.com15

newoldstamp.com15

codetwo.com14

textexpander.com13

182 of the 182 domain citations in answers naming Opensense came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

wisestamp.com/guides/best-email-signature-management-software22

mailbutler.io/blog/email/email-signature-management-tools21

guideflow.com/blog/best-email-signature-software20

wisestamp.com/18

newoldstamp.com/blog/email-signature-software15

textexpander.com/blog/best-email-signature-managers13

wisestamp.com/guides/best-office-365-email-signature-software11

signitic.com/en/resources/the-ultimate-guide-to-email-signature-software-in-202510

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

opensense.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Opensense takes 0% of first choices and Exclaimer takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “email signature management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best email signature management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 2,400 a month (“opensense”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 11 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,555 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 807 · 22 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,015
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

49 ads · 49 text · 44 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Opensense, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 34 in the year, 15 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 12 of 48 in email signatures

Segment leader

33%

Exclaimer

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 38 answers
Its own site cited: in 38 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on opensense.com

468

subdomains included

Content

347

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 42

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	168	3	2026-09-04	ABM, Email signatures
Podcast or video	114	0	2023-03-14	ABM, SEO
Case study	25	undated		Email signatures, ABM
Comparison	15	0	2017-07-17
Report or ebook	9	undated		ABM
Webinar or virtual event	6	0	2021-02-18
Conference or event	6	undated		ABM
Template or tool	3	0	2024-05-23
Glossary or explainer	1	0	2020-05-04

Most recent

2026-09-04How to deploy email signatures outlook cannot override blog
2026-09-04How to fix branded email signatures on mobile blog
2026-09-02Email signature governance blog
2026-05-07Brand consistency employee email financial institution blog
2026-05-07The email channel your marketing team doesnt control blog
2026-04-23Opensense joins td synnex streamone cloud marketplace blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page opensense.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ABM (18); 5 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Opensense

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Opensense; a claim can dispute any of them.

OpenSense 6

Follow Opensense

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Opensense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Opensense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Opensense by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Opensense is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Opensense, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.