Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 49 of 59, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedTemplafy
25Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Templafy was named 6 times in DAM and 1 other category, where Canto led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business56 of 67
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market17 of 70
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise30 of 56
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In dam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Templafy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital asset management | Marketing | 0% | 17 of 70 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Canto at 45% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Email signature management | Marketing | 0% | 32 of 48 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Exclaimer at 33% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Templafy held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · DAM · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 of 63, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 26 of 52, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 17 of 70, unchanged |
| Email signatures | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 48, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Templafy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Templafy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Templafy if email signatures are part of a broader document governance/content standardization strategy.” Perplexity Sonar · Email signatures · comparative prompt · alternative
“### 2. Templafy - Best for: Mid-size companies (50-200 employees), fast-growing startups” MiniMax M2.5 · DAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If your main need is document generation... Templafy is a strong alternative.” Mistral Small · DAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Templafy, which is suitable for mid-size companies with 50-200 employees” Llama 4 Maverick · DAM · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Templafy, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Templafy was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Templafy, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Templafy was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Templafy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Templafy and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com12
templafy.comYour site11
g2.com9
exclaimer.com7
marq.com7
wisestamp.com7
newoldstamp.com6
thecmo.com6
canto.com5
codetwo.com5
Sixty-four of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming Templafy came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on templafy.com
676
subdomains included
Content
386
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
75 · 7
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 157 | 7 | 2026-10-01 | DAM | |
| Podcast or video | 67 | 5 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| News or press | 66 | 15 | 2026-10-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 60 | 3 | 2026-10-14 | ||
| Report or ebook | 16 | 1 | 2026-10-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 0 | 2026-01-27 | ||
| Case study | 5 | 0 | 2026-05-19 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 4 | 2026-09-30 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-14When teams are creating documents with ai whos in control webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-13Templafy connect sydney webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-01Beyond the first draft closing the ai productivity gap blog
- 2026-10-01Knowledge workers edit ai generated documents news or press
- 2026-10-01The business ready ai gap 2026 report or ebook
- 2026-09-30Brand governance vs brand compliance comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page templafy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Templafy
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Templafy is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Templafy is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agentic document generation platform
- For
- businesses that rely on documents
- Price stated
- Free; $40 per user/month*; Custom templafy.com/home/pricing
- Starting price
- Free templafy.com/home/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free templafy.com
- Customers named
- TIETOADOBEIPSOSKPMGBDOTietoevry
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Templafy's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: templafy.com, templafy.com/home/pricing, trust.templafy.com, templafy.com/home/platform, templafy.com/home/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Templafy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Templafy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Templafy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Templafy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Templafy, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.