GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Bynder · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Bynder

134Judge labels
23First choices
39Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
33% in DAM for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 68 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 19% of its 48 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
In dam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bynder for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Digital asset managementMarketing15%3 of 6819%48accepted challenger
Content marketing platformsMarketing0%56 of 1590%1under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bynder yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bynder across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510203
GPT-5.4 mini21003
Gemini 3.5 Flash13026
Perplexity Sonar11103
Grok 4.1 Fast03115
Mistral Small02013
DeepSeek V4 Flash13015
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash13206
Kimi K202136
GLM 4.7 FlashX02114
MiniMax M2.511103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct27 labels10
Paraphrase27 labels10
Comparative31 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained17 labelsNone
Scale-constrained12 labels3
Negative20 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative134 labels in all, every segment counted; 23 of the 32 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best overall DAM is usually Bynder if you want the strongest balance of brand governance, integrations, and scalability” Perplexity Sonar · DAM · direct prompt · first choice
“Bynder is the most widely recognized option... the most analyst-recognized name in the category” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAM · direct prompt · first choice
“Bynder — Best for Enterprise Brand Consistency ... with Bynder also named Customer Favorite.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Bynder if you prioritize brand governance and have distributed teams” MiniMax M2.5 · DAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High-Risk DAM Systems to Avoid ... 1. Bynder ... Be extremely cautious with Bynder due to its migration issues and user experience problems.” Mistral Small · DAM · negative prompt · hard negative
“often cost thousands per month” Kimi K2 · DAM · budget prompt · hard negative
“enterprise-grade tools like Bynder, Brandfolder, or Frontify are often out of reach for companies with limited budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · budget prompt · soft negative
“Caveat: Higher cost ..., longer implementation, steeper learning curve, and complex per-user licensing.” Kimi K2 · DAM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bynder, over the 134 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bynder was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Canto89 of 13427Compare →
Brandfolder86 of 1341Not in the top three
Adobe Experience Manager Assets69 of 1346Not in the top three
Aprimo67 of 1349Not in the top three
Acquia DAM57 of 1341Not in the top three
MediaValet52 of 1345Not in the top three
Frontify45 of 1340Not in the top three
Air40 of 1347Not in the top three
Cloudinary36 of 1340Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bynder. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 134 answers that named Bynder and are not a share of its labels.

The company

Bynder.
Website
bynder.com
Headquarters
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Founded
2013

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bynder's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bynder, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bynder.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.