Every category where a model named Acquia DAM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital asset management	Marketing	0%	16 of 68	16%	25	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Acquia DAM yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Acquia DAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	3	0	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative21 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative61 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A robust enterprise-grade solution that is particularly strong for companies with heavy product libraries” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · scale prompt · alternative

“strong if you care most about metadata depth, taxonomy, and governance” GPT-5.4 mini · DAM · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for Product-Heavy B2B (Manufacturing, E-Commerce, Distribution)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Product-asset focus; ecosystem commitment, steeper learning curve.” Grok 4.1 Fast · DAM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Some (e.g., Acquia DAM/Widen) get complaints on slow performance with large files/videos, bulk uploads, or millions of assets.” Grok 4.1 Fast · DAM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Heavyweight, expensive, often require coding knowledge... Usually overkill” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DAM · scale prompt · soft negative

“Slow search and file retrieval performance... Limited integrations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DAM · negative prompt · soft negative

“POST-ACQUISITION CAUTION ... Declining Support Quality” Kimi K2 · DAM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Acquia DAM, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acquia DAM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bynder57 of 6016Not in the top three

Brandfolder44 of 601Not in the top three

Aprimo41 of 6011Not in the top three

Canto39 of 606Not in the top three

Adobe Experience Manager Assets39 of 603Not in the top three

MediaValet35 of 603Not in the top three

Frontify28 of 600Not in the top three

Cloudinary26 of 600Not in the top three

Filecamp19 of 602Not in the top three

Orange Logic19 of 601Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Acquia DAM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 60 answers that named Acquia DAM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

canto.com7

getmasset.com5

stockpress.co5

vntana.com5

aprimo.com4

cmswire.com4

frontify.com4

g2.com4

papirfly.com4

celum.com3

Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Acquia DAM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

canto.com/blog/top-dam-software6

getmasset.com/digital-asset-management-software5

stockpress.co/resources/10-resources-best-digital-asset-management-software-20265

cmswire.com/digital-asset-management/examining-19-enterprise-digital-asset-management-solu4

frontify.com/en/guide/digital-asset-management-software4

papirfly.com/blog/digital-asset-management/top-digital-asset-management-solutions-comparis4

vntana.com/roundup/best-digital-asset-management-software4

aprimo.com/blog/best-digital-asset-management-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Acquia DAM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Acquia DAM; a claim can dispute any of them.

Acquia DAM (Widen) 9Acquia DAM (formerly Widen) 7Acquia 2Acquia DAM (formerly Widen Collective) 1

The company

Acquia is the company behind Acquia DAM.

Website: acquia.com
Headquarters: Boston, United States
Founded: 2007

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Acquia DAM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Acquia DAM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at acquia.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.