Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 65 → 58 of 59
Acquia · 2 categories · RankedAcquia DAM
76Judge labels
4First choices
15Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in DAM for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 70 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Acquia DAM →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business66 of 67
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market6 of 70
2%21 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 56
4%41 labels
accepted challenger
In dam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Acquia DAM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital asset management | Marketing | 2% | 6 of 70 | 5% | 21 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Marketing resource management | Marketing | 0% | 38 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Acquia DAM held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · DAM · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 6 of 63
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 6 → 5 of 52
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAM | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 6 of 70 |
| Marketing resource mgt | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 38 of 110, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Acquia DAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Acquia DAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labelsNone
Paraphrase10 labelsNone
Comparative20 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels3
Scale-constrained8 labels1
Negative14 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative76 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“such as Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, or Acquia/Widen” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · scale prompt · first choice
“Acquia DAM is best for mid-market and enterprise organizations where product data and brand assets share workflows” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAM · direct prompt · alternative
“if you want a mid-market/enterprise option and are looking to move from shared drives into a more structured DAM” GPT-5.4 mini · DAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for Product-Heavy B2B (Manufacturing & eCommerce): Acquia DAM ... is the strongest choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“there are recurring complaints to be aware of... Poor search functionality” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Acquia DAM, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acquia DAM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Acquia DAM, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acquia DAM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Acquia DAM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 76 answers that named Acquia DAM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
vntana.com38
cloudinary.com37
canto.com30
templafy.com28
air.inc27
zapier.com27
cmswire.com26
getmasset.com26
g2.com23
aprimo.com22
284 of the 284 domain citations in answers naming Acquia DAM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
acquia.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Acquia DAM takes 2% of first choices and Canto takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
acquia.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Acquia DAM takes 2% of first choices and Canto takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “digital asset management system”
7
Position for “best digital asset management system”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“acquia dam”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 8 a month
- Its company's site
- acquia.com shared with Acquia's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 72,942 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,526 · 732 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 10,815
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 51 clicks and $2,943 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 6 of 70 in DAM
Segment leader
45%
Canto
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 76 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 75 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Acquia DAM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Acquia DAM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Acquia DAM (Widen) 7Acquia DAM (formerly Widen) 5Acquia 1Acquia DAM (formerly Widen Collective) 1Acquia DAM + Campaign Operations 1Acquia/Widen 1
Follow Acquia DAM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Acquia is the company behind Acquia DAM.ShowHide
The company
Acquia is the company behind Acquia DAM.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- acquia.com
- Headquarters
- Boston, United States
- Founded
- 2007
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Digital Asset Management (DAM)
- For
- general user testing
- Price stated
- Acquia DAM pricing is customized based on your organization's size, number of users, storage requirements, and feature needs. acquia.com/products/acquia-dam
- Free plan or trial
- free trial acquia.com/acquia-dam-tour
- Integrations claimed
- 300 acquia.com/products/acquia-dam
- Customers named
- BayerMarsUniversity of GeorgiaTrussellUNICEFCrayolaT-MobileBrooks
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, certifications, hosting
What Acquia DAM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: acquia.com/acquia-dam-tour, acquia.com/acquia-dam-trial, acquia.com/demos/acquia-dam, acquia.com/products/acquia-dam, acquia.com/integrations/grin-acquia-dam. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Acquia DAM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Acquia DAM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Acquia DAM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Acquia DAM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Acquia DAM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.