Every category where a model named Acquia Web Governance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Website governance and accessibility	Marketing	10%	3 of 98	4%	23	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Acquia Web Governance yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Acquia Web Governance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	1	0	4
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	2	0	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct30 labels13

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative23 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels2

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative72 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Acquia Web Governance is designed to assist organizations in managing their digital presence by enabling oversight of website content quality, accessibility, and compliance standards” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Website governance · direct prompt · first choice

“Most mid-market buyers find Acquia Web Governance hits the sweet spot of features, affordability, and implementation speed” Kimi K2 · Website governance · direct prompt · first choice

“organizations use a broad governance suite such as Siteimprove or Acquia Web Governance for ongoing program-level oversight” Muse Glimmer 30B · Website governance · comparative prompt · first choice

“the strongest recommendation is Acquia Web Governance (Monsido) as the best all-around platform” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Website governance · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it's more of a full governance platform than a budget option” GPT-5.4 mini · Website governance · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Acquia Web Governance, over the 72 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acquia Web Governance was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Siteimprove60 of 7222Compare →

Silktide51 of 7215Compare →

accessiBe25 of 722Not among the top eight

UserWay21 of 725Compare →

DubBot18 of 722Not among the top eight

Level Access18 of 722Not among the top eight

AudioEye13 of 720Compare →

SortSite11 of 725Not among the top eight

Deque axe Platform11 of 720Not among the top eight

Pope Tech6 of 722Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Acquia Web Governance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 72 of the 72 answers that named Acquia Web Governance and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com56

silktide.com54

webtonic.io38

acquia.comYour site30

us.fitgap.com25

gitnux.org20

sourceforge.net20

accessibilitychecker.org19

accessible.org19

worldmetrics.org18

269 of the 299 domain citations in answers naming Acquia Web Governance came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

silktide.com/blog/best-web-governance-platforms51

webtonic.io/blog/best-website-accessibility-ada-tools36

accessibilitychecker.org/blog/siteimprove-alternatives18

g2.com/categories/Digital-accessibility-platforms/small-business18

accessibilitycloud.com/the-digital-accessibility-platform-landscape-16-platforms-reviewed16

accessible.org/top-accessibility-software-market15

g2.com/categories/digital-governance15

gitnux.org/best/web-governance-software15

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

acquia.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Acquia Web Governance takes 10% of first choices and Siteimprove takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “website governance and accessibility platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best website governance and accessibility platform”

Searches for its name, Google: 170 a month (“acquia web governance”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 7 a month
Its company's site: acquia.com shared with Acquia's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 72,942 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 6,526 · 732 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 10,815
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 51 clicks and $2,943 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 90 text, 17 image, 13 video · 92 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2025, as Acquia Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 71 in the year, 49 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

10%

rank 3 of 98 in website governance

Segment leader

25%

Siteimprove

First choices: 15 across its categories
Named in: 72 answers
Its own site cited: in 72 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Acquia Web Governance

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Acquia Web Governance; a claim can dispute any of them.

Acquia Web Governance (formerly Monsido) 6Acquia Web Governance (Formerly Monsido) 1Acquia Web Governance / Monsido 1Acquia/Monsido 1Siteimprove / Acquia Web Governance 1

Follow Acquia Web Governance

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Acquia is the company behind Acquia Web Governance.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: acquia.com
Headquarters: Boston, United States
Founded: 2007
Also from Acquia: Acquia DAM, Acquia DAM, formerly Widen Collective, Acquia Drupal, Acquia Monsido, Acquia Optimize, Acquia Personalization, Mautic

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Acquia Web Governance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Acquia Web Governance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Acquia Web Governance by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Acquia Web Governance is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Acquia Web Governance, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Acquia Web Governance is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Acquia Web Governance is among the products AI models recommend first in Website governance and accessibility this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/website-governance-and-accessibility/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/acquia-web-governance--website-governance-and-accessibility-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Website governance and accessibility, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Website governance and accessibility standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/website-governance-and-accessibility/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/acquia-web-governance--website-governance-and-accessibility-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Website governance and accessibility, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Website governance and accessibility standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/website-governance-and-accessibility/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/acquia-web-governance--website-governance-and-accessibility-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Website governance and accessibility, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Website governance and accessibility standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.