1 category · RankedLevel Access
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Website governance and accessibility | Marketing | 0% | 22 of 98 | 19% | 16 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Level Access across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“unless you already have a mature governance program and only need accessibility — in which case Level Access or Pope Tech could work” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Website governance · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose Level Access if you are a large enterprise in a regulated industry and need to outsource the testing expertise.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Website governance · comparative prompt · alternative
“Enterprise: Level Access, Silktide, BrowserStack (high G2 scores, hybrid automated + manual).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Website governance · negative prompt · alternative
“Level Access combines accessibility testing software with legal expertise and managed services” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Website governance · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Level Access is known for professional audits but can be complex and resource heavy to maintain.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Website governance · scale prompt · soft negative
“the enterprise suites — Siteimprove, Level Access / Deque — are typically overkill” Muse Glimmer 30B · Website governance · budget prompt · soft negative
“Pricing typically starts at $25,000+ annually — may exceed mid-market budgets” Kimi K2 · Website governance · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Level Access, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Level Access was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 64 of the 68 answers that named Level Access and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
284 of the 284 domain citations in answers naming Level Access came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
levelaccess.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Level Access takes 0% of first choices and Siteimprove takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“level access”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 891 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 58,285 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,660 · 242 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 10,288
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 50 clicks and $983 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 68 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 64 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 341 | 15 | 2026-09-21 | SEO, Mobile apps | |
| News or press | 80 | 2 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 41 | 4 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 9 | 0 | 2026-05-20 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2025-04-27 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-01-05 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Ondemand videos webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-21Skip links how to add style and test them for wcag 2 4 1 blog
- 2026-09-21Connect accessibility metrics to organizational outcomes blog
- 2026-09-21How the new mexico dca cut critical accessibility findings by 97 blog
- 2026-09-16Level access research finds broad ai adoption isnt closing the accessibility gap news or press
- 2026-09-14Four digital accessibility trends to watch in 2027 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page levelaccess.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as Level Access
Follow Level Access
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Level Access's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Level Access, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Level Access by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Level Access is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Level Access, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.