1 category · RankedAudioEye
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Website governance and accessibility | Marketing | 3% | 9 of 98 | 44% | 25 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated AudioEye across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“AudioEye - Best for managed remediation plus monitoring for SMB to mid-market teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · Website governance · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Recommendation: AudioEye” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Website governance · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“strong if you want active monitoring and some automatic fixes, but it still benefits from expert testing alongside automation” Perplexity Sonar · Website governance · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose AudioEye if your main goal is accessibility compliance with strong automation and expert remediation.” GPT-5.4 mini · Website governance · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“court rulings (such as in *LightHouse v. ADP*) have explicitly stated that overlay solutions do not constitute adequate accessibility fixes under the law” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Website governance · negative prompt · hard negative
“Similar overlay issues; involved in lawsuits where it was cited as a barrier, not a fix.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Website governance · negative prompt · hard negative
“AudioEye - One of the overlay platforms that has appeared in lawsuit data” MiniMax M2.5 · Website governance · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid relying solely on AccessiBe/AudioEye/UserWay widgets for compliance” Kimi K2 · Website governance · comparative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AudioEye, over the 69 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AudioEye was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 67 of the 69 answers that named AudioEye and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
272 of the 303 domain citations in answers naming AudioEye came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
audioeye.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AudioEye takes 3% of first choices and Siteimprove takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“audioeye”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 66 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 36,679 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,716 · 363 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 10,966
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 214 clicks and $3,630 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 69 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 67 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page audioeye.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow AudioEye
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AudioEye's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AudioEye, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AudioEye by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AudioEye is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AudioEye, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.