Index › Products › EqualWeb · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

EqualWeb

25Judge labels

0First choices

18Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. EqualWeb was named 9 times in Website governance, where Siteimprove led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business74 of 78

under the label threshold

Mid-market98 of 98

under the label threshold

Enterprise83 of 84

under the label threshold

In website governance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named EqualWeb for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Website governance and accessibility	Marketing	0%	98 of 98	78%	9	under 10 labels · led by Siteimprove at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EqualWeb yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EqualWeb across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative16 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Do not rely on these as your primary compliance strategy. Overlays do not fix the underlying code” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Website governance · scale prompt · hard negative

“Other major players in the overlay space that face similar technical and legal criticisms.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Website governance · negative prompt · hard negative

“Overlay-based; same detection/remediation limits, poor user reviews from disabled testers” Grok 4.1 Fast · Website governance · negative prompt · hard negative

“Strong negative reviews; criticized for similar limitations as other overlays” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Website governance · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EqualWeb, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EqualWeb was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Siteimprove21 of 259Not among the top eight

UserWay20 of 250Not among the top eight

accessiBe19 of 250Not among the top eight

AudioEye16 of 250Not among the top eight

Silktide13 of 252Not among the top eight

Level Access11 of 253Not among the top eight

DubBot8 of 250Not among the top eight

Monsido8 of 250Not among the top eight

axe DevTools6 of 252Not among the top eight

Deque axe Platform5 of 251Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EqualWeb. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 25 answers that named EqualWeb and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

us.fitgap.com13

g2.com12

silktide.com12

testparty.ai12

webtonic.io11

accessibilitychecker.org9

halfaccessible.com8

accessibility.works7

accessibilitychecker.com7

accessible.org7

No domain is on file for EqualWeb, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

silktide.com/blog/best-web-governance-platforms11

webtonic.io/blog/best-website-accessibility-ada-tools11

halfaccessible.com/accessibility-overlays-ada-lawsuits8

accessibility.works/blog/accessibility-overlay-widgets-attract-lawsuits5

accessibilitychecker.org/blog/siteimprove-alternatives5

g2.com/categories/Digital-accessibility-platforms5

g2.com/categories/digital-governance5

us.fitgap.com/search/digital-accessibility-platforms/enterprise5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow EqualWeb

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EqualWeb's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EqualWeb, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EqualWeb by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where EqualWeb is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name EqualWeb, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.