Every category where a model named DubBot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Website governance and accessibility	Marketing	2%	10 of 98	0%	14	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DubBot yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DubBot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	2	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	1	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels1

Paraphrase8 labels3

Comparative9 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained9 labels3

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“DubBot is the best fit for a limited-budget company needing both website governance and accessibility coverage” Perplexity Sonar · Website governance · budget prompt · first choice

“For broad governance, demo Siteimprove, Silktide, and DubBot” GPT-6 Luna · Website governance · comparative prompt · first choice

“get a quote from DubBot: it combines accessibility checks with governance policies and other site-quality checks, but doesn’t publish pricing.” GPT-6 Luna · Website governance · budget prompt · alternative

“Best governance-heavy alternative: DubBot or Siteimprove” GPT-5.4 mini · Website governance · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DubBot, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DubBot was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Siteimprove31 of 455Not among the top eight

Silktide29 of 457Not among the top eight

Acquia Web Governance18 of 454Not among the top eight

UserWay17 of 452Not among the top eight

accessiBe15 of 450Not among the top eight

Monsido10 of 450Not among the top eight

Pope Tech9 of 452Not among the top eight

PowerMapper9 of 451Not among the top eight

AudioEye9 of 450Not among the top eight

EqualWeb8 of 450Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DubBot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 45 answers that named DubBot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com33

silktide.com24

us.fitgap.com19

accessibilitychecker.org17

gitnux.org14

webtonic.io14

zipdo.co14

accessible.org10

dubbot.comYour site10

sourceforge.net10

155 of the 165 domain citations in answers naming DubBot came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

silktide.com/blog/best-web-governance-platforms21

webtonic.io/blog/best-website-accessibility-ada-tools14

zipdo.co/best/web-governance-software14

accessibilitychecker.org/blog/siteimprove-alternatives12

gitnux.org/best/web-governance-software12

g2.com/categories/digital-governance10

dubbot.com/9

filestage.io/blog/content-governance-software9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

dubbot.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, DubBot takes 2% of first choices and Siteimprove takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “website governance and accessibility platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best website governance and accessibility platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 590 a month (“dubbot”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 6,988 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 996 · 114 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,146
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

17 ads · 17 text · 10 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2024, as Blaine Herman, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 10 in the year, 7 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 10 of 98 in website governance

Segment leader

25%

Siteimprove

First choices: 7 across its categories
Named in: 45 answers
Its own site cited: in 45 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on dubbot.com

334

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

326

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	2025-11 to 2026-10	Latest	Categories named
Comparison	4	0		2025-08-07
Glossary or explainer	2	0		2026-06-26

Most recent

2026-06-2610131632 subscription upgrades and renewals glossary or explainer
2025-08-072501598 smaller sites vs whole site comparison
2025-07-0110223466 alternative text for images correcting comparison
2025-06-2710176680 alternative text for images the basics comparison
2025-06-2710184649 color contrast issues correcting glossary or explainer
2025-05-226289748 policy set review suspect alt alternative text comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page dubbot.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow DubBot

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DubBot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DubBot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DubBot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where DubBot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name DubBot, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.