Every category where a model named Pope Tech for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Website governance and accessibility	Marketing	3%	7 of 98	8%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pope Tech yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pope Tech across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative7 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained6 labels1

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pope Tech is the clear winner for a budget-conscious company needing *both* web governance and accessibility monitoring” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Website governance · budget prompt · first choice

“Best budget-conscious pick: Pope Tech—if accessibility monitoring is your main need.” GPT-6 Luna · Website governance · budget prompt · first choice

“e.g., Deque Axe, WAVE, Siteimprove, Pope Tech, or Monsido” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Website governance · negative prompt · first choice

“if budget is a primary concern, Pope Tech offers the same core capabilities at a more accessible price point” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Website governance · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Automated tools can only catch 20–40% of real accessibility issues... Only use these if paired with manual testing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Website governance · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pope Tech, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pope Tech was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Siteimprove28 of 315Compare →

Silktide27 of 3111Compare →

accessiBe17 of 310Not among the top eight

UserWay15 of 310Compare →

Wave11 of 310Compare →

AudioEye10 of 310Compare →

axe DevTools10 of 310Not among the top eight

DubBot9 of 313Not among the top eight

SortSite8 of 314Not among the top eight

Deque axe Platform7 of 310Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pope Tech. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named Pope Tech and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

silktide.com26

g2.com21

webtonic.io18

accessible.org14

us.fitgap.com13

accessibilitychecker.org12

testparty.ai12

audioeye.com10

webyes.com10

accessibilitycloud.com9

145 of the 145 domain citations in answers naming Pope Tech came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

silktide.com/blog/best-web-governance-platforms23

webtonic.io/blog/best-website-accessibility-ada-tools18

accessible.org/top-accessibility-software-market13

accessibilitychecker.org/blog/siteimprove-alternatives9

accessibilitycloud.com/the-digital-accessibility-platform-landscape-16-platforms-reviewed8

audioeye.com/post/accessibility-platform-by-company-size6

g2.com/categories/Digital-accessibility-platforms/small-business6

us.fitgap.com/search/digital-governance-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

pope.tech is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pope Tech takes 3% of first choices and Siteimprove takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “website governance and accessibility platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best website governance and accessibility platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 480 a month (“pope tech”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 4 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 3,943 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 950 · 77 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,819
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

2 ads · 2 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2024, as Jay Pope, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 98 in website governance

Segment leader

25%

Siteimprove

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 31 answers
Its own site cited: in 31 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on pope.tech

491

subdomains included

Content

289

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

1 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	265	8	2026-10-04
Comparison	12	0	2024-08-01
Conference or event	6	0	2020-02-01
Case study	3	0	2021-01-01
News or press	2	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	0	2025-10-01

Most recent

2026-10-04Easy ways to make your google forms more accessible video blog
2026-10-02How to make your google forms more accessible blog
2026-09-22Use tags to organize courses and subaccounts blog
2026-08-31Speech recognition basics setup and a quick table demo blog
2026-08-31Speech recognition and complex tables with fields blog
2026-08-12How one university reduced web accessibility errors by 90 blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page pope.tech exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Pope Tech

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pope Tech's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pope Tech, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pope Tech by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Pope Tech is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pope Tech, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.