1 category · RankedaccessiBe
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Website governance and accessibility | Marketing | 2% | 20 of 98 | 71% | 31 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated accessiBe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend starting with UserWay or accessiBe for pure accessibility needs on a budget” MiniMax M2.5 · Website governance · budget prompt · first choice
“For pure accessibility focus, accessiBe or Siteimprove lead.” MiniMax M2.5 · Website governance · comparative prompt · first choice
“Uses AI to automatically map a site's elements and fix accessibility barriers dynamically via its widget. Popular for SMBs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Website governance · comparative prompt · alternative
“Overlay tools starting at ~$49/month, good for quick remediation on smaller sites.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Website governance · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Widely criticized for aggressive marketing that overpromises results... it has faced significant backlash from the disability community and numerous lawsuits.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Website governance · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to avoid or approach with extreme caution: accessiBe (accessWidget): FTC fined $1M in January 2025 for deceptive claims” Grok 4.1 Fast · Website governance · negative prompt · hard negative
“The Major Players to Avoid: Overlay plugins like accessiBe and UserWay typically address only 20-30% of WCAG success criteria” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Website governance · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: AccessiBe, UserWay, AudioEye, and any other "accessibility overlay widget" marketed as instant compliance.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Website governance · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as accessiBe, over the 89 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and accessiBe was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 87 of the 89 answers that named accessiBe and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
353 of the 353 domain citations in answers naming accessiBe came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
accessibe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, accessiBe takes 2% of first choices and Siteimprove takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“accessibe”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 104 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 36,180 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,771 · 165 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,582
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 89 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 87 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 352 | 10 | 2026-09-30 | SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 83 | 9 | 2026-09-20 | ||
| Report or ebook | 35 | 9 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Comparison | 25 | 6 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 19 | 11 | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 14 | 3 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Podcast or video | 13 | 10 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Case study | 11 | 10 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2019-09-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-30Before you file your aoda report what should you check blog
- 2026-09-28Ai automation vs human expertise in accessibility what your organization actually needs comparison
- 2026-09-20Nhs accessibility glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-20Accessible user interface glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-20European web accessibility directive glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-20React js accessibility glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page accessibe.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as accessiBe
Follow accessiBe
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when accessiBe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as accessiBe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for accessiBe by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where accessiBe is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name accessiBe, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.