AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Website governance › UserWay vs AudioEye
Website governance and accessibility · October 2026 Edition

UserWay vs AudioEye

Zero of fourteen models named UserWay first on the direct prompt; zero named AudioEye. UserWay was named by twelve of the fourteen models and AudioEye by twelve and UserWay carries 30 labels and AudioEye 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.

UserWay

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

AudioEye

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share7%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate67%44%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3025A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, UserWay reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Silktide was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Siteimprove vs UserWay · Siteimprove vs AudioEye · Silktide vs UserWay

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the website governance and accessibility page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
UserWayFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAudioEye
Direct002 against UserWay · 1 against AudioEye
Paraphrase02
Comparative005 against UserWay · 2 against AudioEye
Budget-constrained402 against UserWay
Scale-constrained002 against UserWay
Negative009 against UserWay · 8 against AudioEye
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, UserWay and AudioEye were named in the same answer forty-five times, of the 83 answers naming UserWay and the 69 naming AudioEye. In those answers AudioEye took the first choice one time and UserWay three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where UserWay and AudioEye stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
UserWay AudioEye first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, UserWay on the left and AudioEye on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where UserWay and AudioEye stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastAcquia Web Governance alternatives: AudioEye, Level Access, Silktide, Siteimprove
GLM 4.7 FlashXSiteimprove alternatives: AudioEye, Silktide, UserWay

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Acquia Web Governance alternatives: DubBot, Silktide, Siteimprove
GPT-5.4 miniAcquia Web Governance alternatives: DubBot, Silktide, Siteimprove, accessiBe
Gemini 3.5 FlashSilktide alternatives: Acquia Web Governance, DubBot, Monsido
Perplexity SonarSiteimprove alternatives: Acquia Web Governance, PowerMapper
Mistral SmallAcquia Web Governance, Silktide alternatives: Siteimprove
DeepSeek V4 FlashAcquia Web Governance alternatives: Silktide
Llama 4 MaverickMonsido, Silktide
Qwen 3.7 FlashSiteimprove Quality Assurance alternatives: Deque axe Platform, Sudo
Kimi K2Acquia Web Governance, Siteimprove alternatives: Silktide
MiniMax M2.5Monsido, Silktide alternatives: Accessible Web RAMP, Siteimprove
GPT-6 LunaSilktide alternatives: Acquia Web Governance, Siteimprove
Muse Glimmer 30BSiteimprove alternatives: Acquia Web Governance, Monsido, Silktide

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
UserWay leads by nineteen points.
UserWay19%#1 of 12
AudioEye0%#12 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
UserWay leads by three points.
UserWay7%#4 of 13
AudioEye3%#8 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
UserWay0%#8 of 8
AudioEye0%#7 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about UserWay

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“The Major Players to Avoid: Overlay plugins like accessiBe and UserWay typically address only 20-30% of WCAG success criteria” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequently used on WordPress and Shopify sites, but shares the same fundamental technical limitations as other overlays.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Do not rely on these as your primary compliance strategy. Overlays do not fix the underlying code” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · hard negative
“I'd recommend starting with UserWay or accessiBe for pure accessibility needs on a budget” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“UserWay remains the leading choice for small businesses needing a cost-effective widget” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“UserWay and All in One Accessibility are the top choices for small businesses” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about AudioEye

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“court rulings (such as in *LightHouse v. ADP*) have explicitly stated that overlay solutions do not constitute adequate accessibility fixes under the law” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Similar overlay issues; involved in lawsuits where it was cited as a barrier, not a fix.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“AudioEye - One of the overlay platforms that has appeared in lawsuit data” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“AudioEye - Best for managed remediation plus monitoring for SMB to mid-market teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Recommendation: AudioEye” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“strong if you want active monitoring and some automatic fixes, but it still benefits from expert testing alongside automation” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.