Five of fourteen models named Silktide first on the direct prompt; zero named UserWay. Silktide was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and UserWay by twelve and Silktide carries 50 labels and UserWay 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the website governance and accessibility page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Silktide and UserWay were named in the same answer forty-seven times, of the 126 answers naming Silktide and the 83 naming UserWay. In those answers UserWay took the first choice five times and Silktide fourteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“routinely start at $5,000 to $50,000+ per year—are usually out of reach” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“~$500/mo+ | Large enterprises ... Overkill for most small budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Silktide: Known specifically for web governance. It helps manage multiple sites, enforces content quality alongside accessibility, and provides a clear overview for large organizations.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“All-in-one web governance with strong accessibility (WCAG 2.1/2.2 scanning at A/AA/AAA), content quality, SEO, broken links, legal compliance, and user behavior analysis.” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · first choice
“Silktide - a web governance platform that analyzes and improves websites across accessibility, content, SEO, user experience, analytics, and compliance.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“The Major Players to Avoid: Overlay plugins like accessiBe and UserWay typically address only 20-30% of WCAG success criteria” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequently used on WordPress and Shopify sites, but shares the same fundamental technical limitations as other overlays.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Do not rely on these as your primary compliance strategy. Overlays do not fix the underlying code” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · hard negative
“I'd recommend starting with UserWay or accessiBe for pure accessibility needs on a budget” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“UserWay remains the leading choice for small businesses needing a cost-effective widget” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“UserWay and All in One Accessibility are the top choices for small businesses” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.