Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
Acquia · 2 categories · Named, not rankedMautic
5Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mautic was named 2 times in Lead routing and 1 other category, where LeadAngel led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market51 of 111
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In lead routing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Mautic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 51 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Marketing automation and campaign management | Marketing | 0% | 54 of 59 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 63% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Mautic held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Lead routing · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 46 of 103, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 111, unchanged |
| Marketing automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 54 of 59 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Mautic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Mautic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Free, self‑hosted, highly customizable routing and automation.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lead routing · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid this version if you do not have a developer or IT team” MiniMax M2.5 · Marketing automation · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mautic, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mautic was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mautic, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mautic was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mautic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 5 answers that named Mautic and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hubspot.com3
factors.ai2
vendorbenchmark.com2
acquia.comYour site1
adstellar.ai1
alphabold.com1
arisegtm.com1
articsledge.com1
bitrix24.com1
blog.hubspot.com1
Thirteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Mautic came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
acquia.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mautic takes 0% of first choices and LeadAngel takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
acquia.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mautic takes 0% of first choices and LeadAngel takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lead routing and management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best lead routing and management tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- acquia.com shared with Acquia's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 72,942 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,526 · 732 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 10,815
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 51 clicks and $2,943 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 51 of 111 in lead routing
Segment leader
26%
LeadAngel
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 5 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 4 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Mautic
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mautic; a claim can dispute any of them.
Mautic (Self-Hosted) 1
Follow Mautic
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Acquia is the company behind Mautic.ShowHide
The company
Acquia is the company behind Mautic.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- acquia.com
- Headquarters
- Boston, United States
- Founded
- 2007
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mautic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mautic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mautic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mautic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mautic, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.