AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › HighLevel · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

HighLevel

10Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HighLevel was named 1 time in Marketing automation, where HubSpot Marketing Hub led with 63%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In marketing automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HighLevel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Marketing automation and campaign managementMarketing0%36 of 590%1under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 63%

Movement

Since September 2026, HighLevel held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Marketing automation · by segment

Enterprise▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 30 → 5 of 50

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Marketing automation0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 36 of 59, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated HighLevel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels3
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HighLevel, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HighLevel was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HubSpot Marketing Hub6 of 101Not among the top eight
ActiveCampaign5 of 101Not among the top eight
Klaviyo4 of 100Not among the top eight
Salesforce Marketing Cloud4 of 100Not among the top eight
Adobe Marketo Engage2 of 100Not among the top eight
Attentive2 of 100Not among the top eight
Impartner PRM2 of 100Not among the top eight
Mailchimp2 of 100Not among the top eight
Monday.com2 of 100Not among the top eight
Omnisend2 of 100Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HighLevel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named HighLevel and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com4
monday.com4
g2.com3
guideflow.com3
gumloop.com3
toolradar.com3
brevo.com2
hubspot.com2
insiderone.com2
maestra.io2

Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming HighLevel came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on highlevelautomationteam.com
44
subdomains included
Content
31
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog25162026-09-16CRM
Case study402025-12-31
Comparison212026-09-09
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page highlevelautomationteam.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow HighLevel

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

HighLevel is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Complete GoHighLevel implementation designed to manage your entire customer lifecycle—from first contact to closed deal and beyond.
For
marketing agencies, coaches, consultants, and local service businesses
Price stated
Basic implementation ($3,000 - $6,000); Standard implementation ($6,000 - $15,000); Complex implementation ($15,000 - $40,000+); monthly retainer $500 - $3,000+ highlevelautomationteam.com
Starting price
3000 highlevelautomationteam.com
Free plan or trial
Book a free 30-minute strategy call highlevelautomationteam.com
Customers named
Roberts Realty GroupTechStart SolutionsPremier Consulting
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting

What HighLevel's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: highlevelautomationteam.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HighLevel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HighLevel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HighLevel by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where HighLevel is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name HighLevel, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at highlevelautomationteam.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.