Every category where a model named Monday.com for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	5%	7 of 159	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30%
CRM	Revenue operations	0%	25 of 71	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot CRM at 41%
Workflow automation and iPaaS	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	20 of 76	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Workato at 38%
Partner relationship management	Partner and channel	0%	25 of 50	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Channeltivity at 24%
Sales commissions and incentive compensation	Revenue operations	0%	12 of 51	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Everstage at 25%
CPQ	Revenue operations	0%	50 of 73	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by DealHub at 62%
Knowledge base and self-service	Customer	0%	61 of 96	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Notion at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Monday.com yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Monday.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	0	3	0	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	2	0	3
Kimi K2	1	1	2	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	1	1	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase18 labels4

Comparative17 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labelsNone

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Recommendation: Asana or Monday.com” Kimi K2 · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“## Best Overall Recommendation: Monday.com” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If you already use Monday.com and want CRM + project management together: → Monday.com CRM” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CRM · direct prompt · alternative

“The Best for Pure Operational Control: monday.com (with Marketing Workflows)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“PM Tools Masquerading as CRMs... They are project management tools, not sales databases.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CRM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Cheaper (~$10-25/user/mo), flexible for workflows, but generic—not marketing-native.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Avoid if: Enterprise deals >$100K” MiniMax M2.5 · CRM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Monday.com, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Monday.com was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ClickUp23 of 661Not in the top three

Asana19 of 662Not in the top three

Pipedrive17 of 662Not in the top three

HubSpot CRM15 of 664Not in the top three

Salesforce Sales Cloud15 of 663Not in the top three

Notion15 of 660Not in the top three

CoSchedule13 of 665Not in the top three

Zapier13 of 665Not in the top three

Airtable13 of 661Not in the top three

Make12 of 667Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Monday.com. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 66 answers that named Monday.com and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com3

atlassian.com2

babylovegrowth.ai2

larksuite.com2

planable.io2

planmoon.app2

adilraseed.com1

agilityportal.io1

aigrowthagent.co1

ayautomate.com1

Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming Monday.com came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

atlassian.com/agile/project-management/workflow-automation-software2

babylovegrowth.ai/en/blog/top-content-planning-tools-2026-build-a-smarter-stack2

guideflow.com/blog/workflow-automation-platforms2

planable.io/blog/content-planning-tools2

planmoon.app/blog/best-content-planning-tools-20262

adilraseed.com/best-content-management-systems-for-digital-marketing-teams1

agilityportal.io/blog/best-ai-workflow-automation-tools1

aigrowthagent.co/articles/best-content-calendar-software-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Monday.com

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Monday.com; a claim can dispute any of them.

monday.com 7monday.com CRM 4

The company

monday.com is the company behind Monday.com.

Website: monday.com
Headquarters: Tel Aviv
Founded: 2012

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Monday.com's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Monday.com, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at monday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.