| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing resource management | Marketing | 4% | 6 of 110 | 26% | 38 | criticized challenger | |
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 2% | 19 of 135 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 12% → 2%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 0% | 104 of 104 | 67% | 12 | criticized challenger | |
| Event management platforms | Marketing | 0% | 68 of 81 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Bizzabo at 28% | |
| Creative automation platforms | Marketing | 0% | 72 of 109 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Bannerflow at 19% | |
| Customer support and helpdesk | Customer | 0% | 48 of 55 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zendesk Support Suite at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Workflow automation and iPaaS | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 53 of 67 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Workato at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I’d recommend Asana as the best all-around content planning and production tool.” GPT-5.4 mini · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Asana (G2 Leader, 4.4/5 from 12,500+ reviews)” Grok 4.20 · Marketing resource mgt · comparative prompt · first choice
“Start with Asana (free) or Monday.com” Kimi K2 · Marketing resource mgt · budget prompt · first choice
“the best value pick is usually Asana” GPT-5.4 mini · Marketing resource mgt · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“they are not true MRMs... trying to force Asana or Monday.com to act as your MRM will result in "tool sprawl."” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Marketing resource mgt · negative prompt · hard negative
“Asana and Notion are generally not recommended for formal client onboarding due to missing key features.” Mistral Small · Client onboarding · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to watch out for: Jira, ClickUp, Asana (when used as client-facing portals)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Client onboarding · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid project management tools like Asana or Trello for core event management tasks.” Mistral Small · Event management · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 150 of the 166 answers that named Asana and are not a share of its labels.
545 of the 545 domain citations in answers naming Asana came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,189 | 1 | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Template or tool | 271 | 2 | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Case study | 225 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 96 | 3 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 34 | 2 | 2026-09-12 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 19 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 17 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 12 | 0 | 2026-01-16 | ||
| News or press | 4 | 0 | 2026-01-28 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2026-01-12 |
Every page asana.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
What Asana's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: asana.com, asana.com/pricing, trust.asana.com, asana.com/product/ai, asana.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Asana's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Asana, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Asana by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: