Adobe · 2 categories · RankedAdobe Workfront
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing resource management | Marketing | 0% | 109 of 110 | 54% | 24 | criticized challenger | |
| Digital asset management | Marketing | 0% | 39 of 70 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Canto at 45% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Adobe Workfront across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: enterprise marketing work management ... Adobe positions Workfront as a centralized platform for the marketing lifecycle” GPT-5.4 mini · Marketing resource mgt · comparative prompt · first choice
“Complex enterprise workflows and resource planning: compare Workfront and Aprimo.” GPT-6 Luna · Marketing resource mgt · comparative prompt · first choice
“Aprimo or Adobe Workfront remain the gold standard despite their complexity.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Marketing resource mgt · comparative prompt · first choice
“The default choice for large enterprises already committed to Adobe's ecosystem” Kimi K2 · Marketing resource mgt · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Opaque pricing - Difficult to understand costs without detailed consultation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Marketing resource mgt · negative prompt · hard negative
“Verdict: Avoid unless you're already an Adobe shop.” Kimi K2 · Marketing resource mgt · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise-level solutions (like *Adobe Workfront* or *Aprimo*) are often too complex, too expensive, and take 6 to 12 months to deploy.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Marketing resource mgt · direct prompt · soft negative
“extreme complexity and steep learning curve... requires a dedicated, full-time system administrator just to maintain it” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Marketing resource mgt · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adobe Workfront, over the 99 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Workfront was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 99 answers that named Adobe Workfront and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
387 of the 387 domain citations in answers naming Adobe Workfront came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Adobe Workfront stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“adobe workfront”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 157 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Adobe's site (adobe.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 11 across its categories
- Named in
- 99 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 97 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Adobe Workfront
Follow Adobe Workfront
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Adobe is the company behind Adobe Workfront.ShowHide
The company
On record
Wikidata- Website
- adobe.com
- Headquarters
- San Jose, United States
- Founded
- 1982
- Employees
- about 25,988 (2021)
- Ownership
- Public, ABS on London Stock Exchange
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Enterprise Project Management Software
- For
- teams and organizations
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Adobe Workfront's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: business.adobe.com/products/workfront.html, developer.adobe.com/workfront-apis, developer.adobe.com/workfront-fusion-apis, developer.adobe.com/workfront-commenting-api, developer.adobe.com/workfront-apis/guides. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Workfront's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Workfront, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adobe Workfront by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Adobe Workfront is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Adobe Workfront, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.