| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programmatic and display advertising | Marketing | 0% | 20 of 96 | 31% | 13 | criticized challenger |
| Search and social advertising platforms | Marketing | 0% | 44 of 137 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 10% |
| Video advertising | Marketing | 0% | 101 of 121 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 24% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best when creative, analytics, and campaign workflows need to connect to Adobe's stack.” Perplexity Sonar · Programmatic · comparative prompt · alternative
“Adobe Advertising Cloud | Enterprise, full-funnel | $1.5M+ | CDP integration” MiniMax M2.5 · Programmatic · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for: Large enterprises standardized on the Adobe Experience Cloud” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Programmatic · comparative prompt · alternative
“Adobe for enterprises—praised for transparency” Grok 4.1 Fast · Programmatic · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid enterprise-only options (e.g., Adobe) with high minimums” Grok 4.1 Fast · Programmatic · scale prompt · hard negative
“| Adobe Advertising Cloud | Enterprise full-stack | $50K+/yr | N/A |” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video ads · scale prompt · soft negative
“Complex Data Management | Very High | Yes | Enterprise Only” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Programmatic · direct prompt · soft negative
“High complexity/cost; relies on partners for inventory” Grok 4.1 Fast · Programmatic · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 71 answers that named Adobe Advertising and are not a share of its labels.
Forty-four of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming Adobe Advertising came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Advertising's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Advertising, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adobe.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.