GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Adobe Advertising · September 2026 Edition
Adobe · 3 categories · Ranked

Adobe Advertising

71Judge labels
7First choices
22Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Paid ads for enterprise buyers
Rank 20 of 96 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 31% of its 13 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In programmatic · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Adobe Advertising for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Programmatic and display advertisingMarketing0%20 of 9631%13criticized challenger
Search and social advertising platformsMarketing0%44 of 1370%2under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 10%
Video advertisingMarketing0%101 of 121100%1under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Adobe Advertising yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Adobe Advertising across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01034
Mistral Small00112
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00112
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative29 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels4
Scale-constrained13 labels2
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative71 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best when creative, analytics, and campaign workflows need to connect to Adobe's stack.” Perplexity Sonar · Programmatic · comparative prompt · alternative
“Adobe Advertising Cloud | Enterprise, full-funnel | $1.5M+ | CDP integration” MiniMax M2.5 · Programmatic · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for: Large enterprises standardized on the Adobe Experience Cloud” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Programmatic · comparative prompt · alternative
“Adobe for enterprises—praised for transparency” Grok 4.1 Fast · Programmatic · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“avoid enterprise-only options (e.g., Adobe) with high minimums” Grok 4.1 Fast · Programmatic · scale prompt · hard negative
“| Adobe Advertising Cloud | Enterprise full-stack | $50K+/yr | N/A |” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video ads · scale prompt · soft negative
“Complex Data Management | Very High | Yes | Enterprise Only” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Programmatic · direct prompt · soft negative
“High complexity/cost; relies on partners for inventory” Grok 4.1 Fast · Programmatic · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Adobe Advertising, over the 71 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Advertising was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
The Trade Desk44 of 7121Not in the top three
Google Display & Video 36034 of 719Not in the top three
Amazon DSP34 of 710Not in the top three
StackAdapt29 of 715Not in the top three
Skai28 of 7115Not in the top three
Marin Software24 of 714Not in the top three
Smartly17 of 711Not in the top three
LinkedIn Campaign Manager13 of 711Not in the top three
MediaMath12 of 710Not in the top three
Optmyzr11 of 711Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adobe Advertising. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 71 answers that named Adobe Advertising and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Adobe Advertising

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Adobe Advertising; a claim can dispute any of them.
Adobe Advertising Cloud 11Adobe 3

The company

Adobe is the company behind Adobe Advertising.
Website
adobe.com
Headquarters
San Jose, United States
Founded
1982
Employees
about 25,988 (2021)
Ownership
Public, ABS on London Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Advertising's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Advertising, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adobe.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack