| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search and social advertising platforms | Marketing | 3% | 8 of 113 | 26% | 31 | criticized challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Creative automation platforms | Marketing | 0% | 84 of 109 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Bannerflow at 19% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paid ads | 5% | 2% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 8 of 113 |
| Creative automation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 84 of 109, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend Skai (formerly Kenshoo) or Marin Software as strong all-in-one options” Grok 4.20 · Paid ads · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Marin Software's self-serve Connect plan is the most commonly cited balanced fit.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Paid ads · direct prompt · first choice
“Check if the tool integrates well with Shopify/Magento feeds, as traditional search platforms sometimes miss the mark here compared to specialized tools like Marin.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paid ads · scale prompt · alternative
“Advanced attribution modeling to unify performance data across Google, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon, and enterprise-grade campaign management” Muse Glimmer 30B · Paid ads · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"Marin Software officially approved a plan of dissolution and liquidation in April 2025. Avoid any remaining sales pitches"; Do not enter new engagements.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Paid ads · negative prompt · hard negative
“you should avoid these legacy enterprise suites... frequently criticized for a clunky, outdated UI” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paid ads · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise platforms like Skai, Marin Software ($500+/month)” Kimi K2 · Paid ads · budget prompt · hard negative
“Don't touch Marin Software—it's bankrupt and dissolved.” Kimi K2 · Paid ads · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 92 of the 105 answers that named Marin Software and are not a share of its labels.
373 of the 373 domain citations in answers naming Marin Software came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 697 | undated | Video ads, SEO | ||
| Blog | 695 | undated | SEO, CRM | ||
| Report or ebook | 318 | undated | Video ads | ||
| Case study | 173 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 69 | undated | Marketing automation, Video ads | ||
| Conference or event | 64 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 50 | undated | Video ads | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 16 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 15 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated |
Every page marinsoftware.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
What Marin Software's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: marinsoftware.com, marinsoftware.com/pricing, marinsoftware.com/solutions/brands, marinsoftware.com/case-studies, marinsoftware.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Marin Software's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Marin Software, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Marin Software by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: