Every category where a model named Optmyzr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Search and social advertising platforms	Marketing	9%	2 of 137	6%	35	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Optmyzr yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Optmyzr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	0	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	0	1	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	3	0	0	5
Mistral Small	0	2	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	1	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	3	1	1	0	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels3

Paraphrase17 labels5

Comparative24 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained15 labels2

Negative15 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative91 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Optmyzr | Deep search optimization, self-serve, fast time-to-value | ~$200-800/month” Kimi K2 · Paid ads · scale prompt · first choice

“For a mid-sized B2B company, Optmyzr is the strongest overall recommendation.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paid ads · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Safer bets: Optmyzr, Opteo, or native tools ... have stronger verified reviews.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Paid ads · negative prompt · first choice

“Optmyzr for search PPC management (Google/Microsoft)” Kimi K2 · Paid ads · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it is less budget-friendly at about $209/month starting price, so it is usually not the best fit for a limited budget” Perplexity Sonar · Paid ads · budget prompt · soft negative

“Excellent for search, but avoid if your primary focus is social media advertising” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paid ads · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Optmyzr, over the 91 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Optmyzr was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Skai50 of 9112Not in the top three

Marin Software48 of 916Not in the top three

Google Ads36 of 919Compare →

WordStream31 of 912Not in the top three

AdEspresso29 of 911Not in the top three

Smartly29 of 911Not in the top three

Madgicx28 of 912Not in the top three

Meta Ads27 of 917Not in the top three

Adzooma26 of 916Not in the top three

LinkedIn Campaign Manager24 of 914Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Optmyzr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 91 answers that named Optmyzr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com7

clicksgeek.com6

almcorp.com5

cometly.com5

get-ryze.ai5

worldmetrics.org5

zapier.com5

adstellar.ai4

fueler.io4

guideflow.com4

Fifty of the fifty domain citations in answers naming Optmyzr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

almcorp.com/blog/ppc-management-software-list5

clicksgeek.com/paid-search-management-service5

zapier.com/blog/pay-per-click-tools5

clicksgeek.com/best-paid-advertising-platforms-for-small-business4

clicksgeek.com/paid-search-management-services4

stackmatix.com/blog/best-ppc-platforms-tools4

adstellar.ai/blog/paid-social-campaign-management-software3

blog.wask.co/digital-marketing/ppc-management-services3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Optmyzr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Optmyzr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at optmyzr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.