Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 21 of 106
6 categories · RankedMadgicx
52Judge labels
1First choices
10Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Paid ads for mid-market buyers
Rank 12 of 113 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Madgicx →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business23 of 113
0%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market12 of 113
2%17 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise85 of 88
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In paid ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Madgicx for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search and social advertising platforms | Marketing | 2% | 12 of 113 | 12% | 17 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Creative automation platforms | Marketing | 0% | 60 of 109 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Bannerflow at 19% | |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 0% | 49 of 115 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 38% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Video advertising | Marketing | 0% | 28 of 114 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 32% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| AI marketing agents | Marketing | 0% | 134 of 157 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Breeze at 24% | |
| Programmatic and display advertising | Marketing | 0% | 45 of 92 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 48% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Madgicx held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Paid ads · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 33 → 10 of 107
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 58 → 77 of 81
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paid ads | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 12 of 113 |
| Creative automation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 109, unchanged |
| Ecommerce marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 58 → 49 of 115 |
| Video ads | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 114, unchanged |
| AI marketing agents | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 134 of 157, unchanged |
| Programmatic | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 45 of 92, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Madgicx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Madgicx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative15 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels1
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative12 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best paid search and social ads management platform for a company with a limited budget is Madgicx, which is a budget-friendly option” Llama 4 Maverick · Paid ads · budget prompt · first choice
“tools like Optmyzr or Madgicx allow you to centralize your workflow” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paid ads · comparative prompt · first choice
“AI-driven platforms like Ryze AI or Madgicx if you want automated optimization across Meta and Google” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paid ads · budget prompt · alternative
“Madgicx is an affordable, AI-powered option specifically designed for Meta advertising.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Programmatic · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid completely: WordStream, Madgicx, Zeely Inc., Ezoic” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paid ads · negative prompt · hard negative
“flags quick-fix DPA tools as limited for demanding users ... "So if you're looking for a quick-fix solution for DPA and you aren't too demanding this is a good choice."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Creative automation · negative prompt · soft negative
“Frequently criticized for overpromising AI-driven optimizations that underdeliver, steep learning curve, and aggressive upselling” Grok 4.20 · Paid ads · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Madgicx, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Madgicx was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Madgicx, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Madgicx was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Madgicx. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 52 answers that named Madgicx and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com25
g2.com24
madgicx.comYour site24
get-ryze.ai22
resources.rework.com18
adstellar.ai15
worldmetrics.org14
adlibrary.com13
fueler.io13
optmyzr.com13
157 of the 181 domain citations in answers naming Madgicx came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
madgicx.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Madgicx takes 2% of first choices and Google Ads takes 13%.ShowHide
Search and answers
madgicx.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Madgicx takes 2% of first choices and Google Ads takes 13%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “paid search and social ads management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best paid search and social ads management platform”
9
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“madgicx”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 31 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 66,882 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 10,327 · 327 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,926
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 113 in paid ads
Segment leader
13%
Google Ads
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 52 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 50 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on madgicx.com
1,559
subdomains included
Content
1,386
counted in the table below
Documentation
129
Product · Integration
2 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,047 | undated | Marketing automation, Video ads | ||
| Report or ebook | 217 | undated | Mobile apps | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 57 | undated | |||
| Case study | 30 | 0 | 2025-08-28 | ||
| Comparison | 23 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 12 | undated |
Most recent
- 2025-08-28Wyshmasterbeats case study
- 2025-08-28Vordermann sick series case study
- 2025-08-28Venture suite case study
- 2025-08-28Tlf appareal case study
- 2025-08-28Tanganyika wildlife park case study
- 2025-08-28Sri vishwanath case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page madgicx.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Madgicx
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Madgicx is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Madgicx is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- an agentic AI advertising platform for Meta/Facebook ads that autonomously optimizes campaigns, generates and tests ad creative, and reports on performance for e-commerce businesses and agencies
- For
- e-commerce businesses and agencies
- Price stated
- Early-Bird Offer: accurate data analysis for $29/mo forever! madgicx.com
- Starting price
- 0 madgicx.com
- Free plan or trial
- Try for Free ($0 Trial) madgicx.com
- Certifications
- Official Meta Partner
- Customers named
- upjers.comWizerlinkTahylor MadeRepcillinCompetitive EdgeNegative ApparelA.M. Fishing
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Madgicx's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: madgicx.com, madgicx.com/pricing, madgicx.com/products/ad-launcher, madgicx.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Madgicx's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Madgicx, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Madgicx by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Madgicx is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Madgicx, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.