| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search and social advertising platforms | Marketing | 7% | 5 of 113 | 19% | 31 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 3% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Retail media platforms | Marketing | 5% | 5 of 121 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retail media | 0% | 7% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 7% now. | New this edition | Rank 5 of 121, unchanged |
| Paid ads | 3% | 8% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 3% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 5 of 113 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Enterprise-grade platform that manages advertising across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, Amazon, and Apple Search Ads from a single interface” MiniMax M2.5 · Paid ads · direct prompt · first choice
“If you have a dedicated, skilled PPC manager: Lean toward Skai or MEGA AI for heavy-hitting automation and deep optimization.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paid ads · scale prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Skai (formerly Kenshoo) ... Skai edges out as the overall best balance for robust B2B management.” Grok 4.20 · Paid ads · direct prompt · first choice
“the best platform for a mid-sized B2B company to run and manage retail media ads would be Skai, formerly known as Kenshoo” Llama 4 Maverick · Retail media · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid heavy enterprise platforms like Skai or CommerceIQ unless you plan on hiring a dedicated agency” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Retail media · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise platforms like Skai” Kimi K2 · Paid ads · budget prompt · hard negative
“Be very cautious with Skai/Kenshoo unless you're a large enterprise with dedicated implementation resources.” Kimi K2 · Paid ads · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution advised for Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs)... Entry-level pricing starts around $114,000/year” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paid ads · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 155 of the 158 answers that named Skai and are not a share of its labels.
441 of the 499 domain citations in answers naming Skai came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 629 | 13 | 2026-09-27 | SEO | |
| Case study | 152 | 6 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 61 | 0 | 2025-05-07 | ||
| Report or ebook | 33 | 2 | 2026-07-28 | ||
| News or press | 25 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Comparison | 8 | 2 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 0 | 2023-02-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 1 | 2026-10-21 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2025-06-01 |
As the event pages on skai.io state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page skai.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Skai's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: skai.io, skai.io/pricing, skai.io/capabilities, skai.io/customers, skai.io/company/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Skai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: