GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Smartly · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Smartly

60Judge labels
3First choices
20Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Paid ads for enterprise buyers
Rank 13 of 137 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 13% of its 15 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In paid ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Smartly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Search and social advertising platformsMarketing2%13 of 13713%15accepted challenger
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%104 of 108100%1under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Smartly yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Smartly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small01113
DeepSeek V4 Flash01113
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash10102
Kimi K211002
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative17 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained16 labels2
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Creative automation at scale | Smartly.io ... enterprise management layer (like Skai or Smartly.io)” Kimi K2 · Paid ads · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you are heavy on Social/Meta: Look closely at Smartly.io or Sprinklr.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paid ads · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Smartly.io if you are an enterprise team requiring automatic templating and dynamic video variation at a grand scale.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paid ads · comparative prompt · alternative
“Enterprise needing scale + creative production? → Smartly.io or Skai” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paid ads · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid: Agencies ($500+/month retainers) or enterprise tools (Smartly.io custom/$2K+) until proven ROI.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Paid ads · budget prompt · hard negative
“Chat support quality described as "terrible" and "untrained"” Mistral Small · Channel marketing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Caution Level: MODERATE — Be cautious on support expectations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paid ads · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Smartly, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Smartly was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Skai48 of 6017Not in the top three
Marin Software45 of 605Not in the top three
Optmyzr29 of 604Not in the top three
Sprinklr20 of 600Not in the top three
Madgicx18 of 602Not in the top three
Adobe Advertising17 of 602Not in the top three
Google Ads16 of 607Not in the top three
Google Search Ads 36016 of 604Not in the top three
Meta Ads15 of 607Not in the top three
WordStream13 of 601Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Smartly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 60 answers that named Smartly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fueler.io4
pickmysoft.com3
worldmetrics.org3
adstellar.ai2
almcorp.com2
clicksgeek.com2
cometly.com2
designrush.com2
g2.com2
get-ryze.ai2

Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Smartly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Smartly

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Smartly; a claim can dispute any of them.
Smartly.io 12
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Smartly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Smartly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at smartly.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.