GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Canva · September 2026 Edition
9 categories · Ranked

Canva

77Judge labels
8First choices
5Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
9Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Content marketing for small business buyers
Rank 9 of 159 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Canva for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Content marketing platformsMarketing2%9 of 1599%11accepted challenger
Ecommerce marketingMarketing0%24 of 1540%4under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 36%
Proposal softwareRevenue operations0%33 of 7933%3under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 49%
Landing pages and interactive contentMarketing0%19 of 780%2under 10 labels · led by Unbounce at 28%
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%64 of 1080%1under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
Sales enablement and contentSales0%39 of 810%1under 10 labels · led by Dock at 19%
Search and social advertising platformsMarketing0%81 of 1370%1under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 10%
Social media managementMarketing0%49 of 59100%1under 10 labels · led by Sprout Social at 37%
Video advertisingMarketing0%75 of 1210%1under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Canva yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Canva across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash03003
Perplexity Sonar00112
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash02013
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX11103
MiniMax M2.501102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained47 labels8
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative77 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Canva Free → Create all visual content” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Content marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“Use Canva's free tier to access thousands of highly professional business proposal templates.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proposals · budget prompt · alternative
“Canva: Essential for creating professional-looking thumbnails, banners, and ads” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Ecommerce marketing · budget prompt · alternative
“HubSpot Free + Canva Free + Buffer Free provides the best foundation to start” Mistral Small · Content marketing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Canva sometimes takes hours or even days to actually publish a post after you hit the button” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Social media · negative prompt · hard negative
“These are content creation helpers, not full platforms for workflow, distribution, and measurement.” Perplexity Sonar · Content marketing · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Google Docs/Canva work as ultra-free basics but lack tracking/e-sign” Grok 4.1 Fast · Proposals · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Canva, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Canva was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Buffer42 of 762Not in the top three
Google Analytics 432 of 760Not in the top three
Mailchimp24 of 760Not in the top three
HubSpot Content Hub19 of 7611Not in the top three
Google Search Console19 of 760Not in the top three
Semrush19 of 760Not in the top three
Notion17 of 761Not in the top three
Jasper14 of 760Not in the top three
CoSchedule12 of 764Not in the top three
HubSpot Marketing Hub11 of 763Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Canva. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 76 answers that named Canva and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

thecmo.com6
blog.hubspot.com5
gartner.com4
influencermarketinghub.com4
averi.ai3
convertmate.io3
postiv.ai3
softwareadvice.com3
storychief.io3
thestacc.com3

Thirty-seven of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Canva came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Canva

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Canva; a claim can dispute any of them.
Canva (free tier) 1Canva Pro 1

The company

Canva.
Website
canva.com
Headquarters
Australia
Founded
2013

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Canva's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Canva, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at canva.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.