| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creative automation platforms | Marketing | 15% | 2 of 109 | 26% | 31 | criticized challenger | |
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 4% | 6 of 135 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI marketing agents | Marketing | 0% | 50 of 157 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Breeze at 24% | |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 0% | 23 of 115 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 38% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 36 of 124 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Marketing resource management | Marketing | 0% | 45 of 110 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24% | |
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 0% | 60 of 117 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Interactive demo platforms | Sales | 0% | 28 of 50 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Storylane at 31% | |
| Proposal software | Revenue operations | 0% | 48 of 56 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 65% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most companies with limited budgets, Canva Pro or Creatopy offer the best balance of affordability, ease of use, and functionality” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Creative automation · budget prompt · first choice
“I recommend starting with Canva Enterprise. It has the lowest friction, covers the widest variety of use cases” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Creative automation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Canva – Offers a free plan with basic design tools, and paid plans start at $18/month. It's user-friendly” Mistral Small · Content marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need primarily design/graphical work: Canva (from $15/mo) - most affordable for creative tasks” MiniMax M2.5 · Creative automation · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Why to avoid for CA: While excellent for individual marketers making one-off assets, they lack the engine to automate "one-to-many" production.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Creative automation · negative prompt · hard negative
“Examples: Canva, Adobe Express. * Why to avoid: While beautiful, these tools do not handle "variables" well.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Proposals · negative prompt · hard negative
“It is not a creative automation platform." ... "Canva is great for humans. It's terrible for automation."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Creative automation · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid entry-level (e.g., Canva) for lacking ad-scale automation” Grok 4.20 · Creative automation · direct prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 137 of the 151 answers that named Canva and are not a share of its labels.
311 of the 311 domain citations in answers naming Canva came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 566 | undated | Direct mail | ||
| Case study | 129 | undated | |||
| News or press | 127 | undated | Direct mail | ||
| Report or ebook | 15 | undated | |||
| Blog | 14 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Every page canva.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
What Canva's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: canva.com, canva.com/ar/pricing, trust.canva.com, canva.com/ar_eg/solutions/it, canva.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Canva's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Canva, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Canva by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Canva is among the products AI models recommend first in Creative automation platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.