GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Adobe Express · September 2026 Edition
Adobe · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Adobe Express

4Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
4 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Adobe Express was named 1 time in Social media, where Sprout Social led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In social media · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Adobe Express for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Social media managementMarketing0%47 of 59100%1under 10 labels · led by Sprout Social at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Adobe Express yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Adobe Express across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“they are not true social media management suites” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Social media · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Adobe Express, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Express was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Canva4 of 40Not in the top three
Vibe.co3 of 42Not in the top three
Wistia3 of 40Not in the top three
YouTube Ads2 of 41Not in the top three
Animaker2 of 40Not in the top three
CapCut2 of 40Not in the top three
Meta Ads2 of 40Not in the top three
Roku2 of 40Not in the top three
Spotify Ads2 of 40Not in the top three
StackAdapt2 of 40Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adobe Express. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 4 answers that named Adobe Express and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

adpushup.com1
adwave.com1
atlassian.com1
dacast.com1
demandbase.com1
g2.com1
guideflow.com1
indiemedia.club1
influencermarketinghub.com1
learn.g2.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Adobe Express came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Adobe is the company behind Adobe Express.
Website
adobe.com
Headquarters
San Jose, United States
Founded
1982
Employees
about 25,988 (2021)
Ownership
Public, ABS on London Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Express's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Express, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adobe.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack