AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Storyteq · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Storyteq

92Judge labels
2First choices
20Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Creative automation for enterprise buyers
Rank 23 of 109 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 22% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Storyteq →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In creative automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Storyteq for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Creative automation platformsMarketing0%23 of 10922%23accepted challenger
Content marketing platformsMarketing0%33 of 1350%3under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Digital asset managementMarketing0%56 of 700%1under 10 labels · led by Canto at 45%goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Storyteq yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Storyteq across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01023
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2002204
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash12115
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna01012
Muse Glimmer 30B00404

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels2
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative40 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative21 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative92 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Placed furthest in "Completeness of Vision" in the 2025 Magic Quadrant.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Storyteq is best for enterprise teams automating asset management, approvals, and campaign rollouts across markets and channels” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Creative automation · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Large brand ecosystems requiring multi-market rollout, localization, and brand consistency.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Creative automation · comparative prompt · alternative
“Need creative automation as part of wider content operations? Consider Storyteq.” GPT-6 Luna · Creative automation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“immediately bypass heavy enterprise creative automation platforms like Celtra, Storyteq, Smartly, or Rocketium” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Creative automation · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise platforms like Celtra, Smartly.io, or Storyteq” Kimi K2 · Creative automation · budget prompt · hard negative
“platforms like Storyteq or Marq are excellent for brand governance... but they are not built for developer-first programmatic HTML5 display ad delivery” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Creative automation · negative prompt · soft negative
“may be worth evaluating at scale, but check the full price, onboarding effort, contract length, and cancellation terms before committing” GPT-6 Luna · Creative automation · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Storyteq, over the 92 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Storyteq was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Celtra66 of 9213Not among the top eight
Bannerflow58 of 926Not among the top eight
Smartly51 of 923Not among the top eight
Canva36 of 9210Not among the top eight
Marq Team34 of 926Not among the top eight
The Brief25 of 925Not among the top eight
AdCreative.ai25 of 923Not among the top eight
CHILI publish19 of 921Not among the top eight
Adobe Express18 of 922Not among the top eight
Viewst18 of 921Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Storyteq. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 92 of the 92 answers that named Storyteq and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bannerflow.com60
marq.com44
wireflow.ai37
creatify.ai35
tryatria.com31
rocketium.ai30
superside.com30
viewst.com28
g2.com25
storyteq.comYour site23

320 of the 343 domain citations in answers naming Storyteq came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

storyteq.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Storyteq takes 0% of first choices and Bannerflow takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “creative automation platform”
5
Position for “best creative automation platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
390 a month (“storyteq”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
11 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,162 a month
Searches its site ranks for
271 · 14 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,353
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
119 ads · 50 image, 41 video, 28 text · 14 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2024, as Storyteq, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 84 in the year, 35 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 109 in creative automation
Segment leader
19%
Bannerflow
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
92 answers
Its own site cited
in 92 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on storyteq.com
690
subdomains included
Content
621
counted in the table below
Documentation
28
Product · Integration
13 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog518172026-09-26DAM, Content marketing
Glossary or explainer6122026-08-23Content marketing, DAM
Case study2712026-09-01
Podcast or video1152026-09-07DAM
Comparison302026-03-24Content marketing
Report or ebook102026-04-07Content marketing
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page storyteq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Storyteq

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Storyteq; a claim can dispute any of them.
Storyteq (by ITG) 1

Follow Storyteq

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Storyteq is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered Content Marketing Platform
For
top brands
Price stated
Price on Application storyteq.com/pricing
Customers named
HeinekenAdHive GroupMcDonald’sMeliá HotelsPureGymFanDuelSupersideAvolta
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Storyteq's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: storyteq.com, storyteq.com/pricing, storyteq.com/solutions, storyteq.com/case-studies, storyteq.com/content-marketing-platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Storyteq's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Storyteq, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Storyteq by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Storyteq is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Storyteq, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at storyteq.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.