Every category where a model named Marq Team for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Creative automation platforms	Marketing	4%	8 of 109	5%	20	accepted challenger
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	0%	60 of 124	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	72 of 135	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Content management systems for marketing sites	Marketing	0%	36 of 55	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 42%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Marq Team yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Marq Team across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	1	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	1	2	0	0	3
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels6

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained10 labelsNone

Negative15 labels5not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative59 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Marq: Best for large distributed teams needing brand governance with self-serve creation (strong template control, 4.8/5 on G2).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Creative automation · negative prompt · first choice

“Marq is the gold standard for mid-market B2B brand compliance.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Creative automation · direct prompt · first choice

“For a typical mid-market B2B company, I'd start with Marq” GPT-6 Luna · Creative automation · direct prompt · first choice

“Need strong brand governance and workflow control? → Marq (Canva Enterprise), Storyteq, or Adobe Firefly Creative Production.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Creative automation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“platforms like Storyteq or Marq are excellent for brand governance... but they are not built for developer-first programmatic HTML5 display ad delivery” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Creative automation · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Marq Team, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Marq Team was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Celtra38 of 596Compare →

Bannerflow35 of 594Compare →

Storyteq34 of 591Not among the top eight

Canva29 of 594Compare →

Smartly29 of 593Compare →

CHILI publish17 of 591Not among the top eight

AdCreative.ai16 of 591Not among the top eight

Adobe Express15 of 591Not among the top eight

The Brief12 of 593Compare →

Bannerbear11 of 590Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Marq Team. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 59 answers that named Marq Team and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

marq.comYour site54

bannerflow.com42

creatify.ai22

superside.com22

tryatria.com22

wireflow.ai19

webrand.com17

viewst.com15

cropink.com12

marpipe.com12

183 of the 237 domain citations in answers naming Marq Team came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

marq.com/blog/creative-automation-tools37

bannerflow.com/blog/best-creative-automation-platforms-202635

creatify.ai/blog/creative-automation-tools-compared22

wireflow.ai/blog/best-creative-automation-software-tools-in-202619

superside.com/blog/creative-automation-tools18

webrand.com/blog/enterprise-top-7-creative-automation-platform-streamline-workflow-202516

bannerflow.com/blog/8-things-to-know-about-creative-automation-platforms15

marq.com/blog/best-creative-management-software14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

marq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Marq Team takes 4% of first choices and Bannerflow takes 19%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “creative automation platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best creative automation platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“marq team”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 62,091 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 8,476 · 379 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 8,594
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

5 ads · 3 video, 2 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2024, as LPS Holdco LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 3 in the year, 2 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 8 of 109 in creative automation

Segment leader

19%

Bannerflow

First choices: 7 across its categories
Named in: 59 answers
Its own site cited: in 59 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on marq.com

712

subdomains included

Content

258

counted in the table below

Documentation

359

Product · Integration

11 · 11

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	146	12	2026-09-26	Direct mail, DAM
Template or tool	47	0	2026-02-27	Direct mail
Glossary or explainer	23	0	2026-04-25	Direct mail
Comparison	17	2	2026-07-12
Case study	16	0	2026-02-10
Report or ebook	6	0	2026-05-11
Webinar or virtual event	2	0	2025-01-20
News or press	1	0	2026-03-16

Most recent

2026-09-26Patient acquisition blog
2026-09-22Global branding strategy blog
2026-09-20Franchise marketing strategy blog
2026-09-15Franchise brand management blog
2026-09-12Brand automation blog
2026-09-01Franchise marketing software blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page marq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Marq Team

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Marq Team; a claim can dispute any of them.

Marq 18Marq (formerly Lucidpress) 4Marq/Canva Enterprise 1

Follow Marq Team

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Marq is the company behind Marq Team.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: marq.com
Founded: 2013

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Brand enablement for businesses
marq.com
For: teams
marq.com
Price stated: $10 per month, billed yearly marq.com/pages/pricing
Starting price: 10 marq.com/pages/pricing
Free plan or trial: Sign up free; Try for free marq.com
Integrations claimed: 11 marq.com/pages/platform/integrations
Customers named: Orchard Real EstatePurdue UniversitySerhantYextPT SolutionsMary CoxReinhartChestnut
Not stated on the pages read: Certifications, hosting

What Marq Team's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: marq.com, marq.com/pages/pricing, marq.com/pages/platform, marq.com/pages/customers, marq.com/pages/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Marq Team's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Marq Team, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Marq Team by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Marq Team is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Marq Team, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.