Every category where a model named Bannerbear for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Creative automation platforms	Marketing	0%	24 of 109	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Bannerflow at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bannerbear yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bannerbear across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“choose Bannerbear if you specifically need programmatic, high-volume creative generation” GPT-6 Luna · Creative automation · budget prompt · alternative

“Bannerbear is the industry-standard developer tool for API-driven creative automation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Creative automation · budget prompt · alternative

“Reputable alternatives often praised: Bannerbear (API-focused)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Creative automation · negative prompt · alternative

“a popular, lightweight alternative loved by developers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Creative automation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bannerbear, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bannerbear was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Canva18 of 237Not among the top eight

Smartly14 of 230Not among the top eight

Celtra13 of 232Not among the top eight

Storyteq13 of 230Not among the top eight

Bannerflow12 of 231Not among the top eight

AdCreative.ai12 of 230Not among the top eight

Marq Team11 of 231Not among the top eight

Creatopy10 of 233Not among the top eight

Abyssale9 of 234Not among the top eight

The Brief8 of 231Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bannerbear. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Bannerbear and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bannerflow.com16

creatify.ai14

marq.com14

tryatria.com13

abyssale.com10

rocketium.ai10

wireflow.ai10

canva.com7

cropink.com6

segwise.ai6

106 of the 106 domain citations in answers naming Bannerbear came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bannerflow.com/blog/best-creative-automation-platforms-202616

creatify.ai/blog/creative-automation-tools-compared14

marq.com/blog/creative-automation-tools12

tryatria.com/blog/ad-creative-automation-platforms9

wireflow.ai/blog/best-creative-automation-software-tools-in-20269

abyssale.com/best-creative-automation-platforms-compared7

cropink.com/creative-automation-tools6

canva.com/pricing5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

bannerbear.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Bannerbear takes 0% of first choices and Bannerflow takes 19%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “creative automation platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best creative automation platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,000 a month (“bannerbear”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 5 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 11,460 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,919 · 130 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,339
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2026, as BlueVision Interactive Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 24 of 109 in creative automation

Segment leader

19%

Bannerflow

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 23 answers
Its own site cited: in 23 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on bannerbear.com

1,353

subdomains included

Content

696

counted in the table below

Documentation

341

Product · Integration

104 · 6

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Template or tool	333	undated
Blog	313	21	2026-09-29	Direct mail
Comparison	13	0	2026-04-22
Podcast or video	13	2	2026-09-30
Report or ebook	7	0	2024-06-04
Webinar or virtual event	6	0	2026-06-02
Conference or event	6	0	2024-09-04
Glossary or explainer	4	0	2026-02-25
News or press	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-30Turn podcast episodes into vertical social clips with bannerbear workflows join resize add subtitles and music podcast or video
2026-09-29How to automate branded shorts in minutes bannerbear workflows tutorial blog
2026-09-25Video how to set up the bannerbear mcp in chatgpt without code blog
2026-09-22How to Pivot Your SaaS Company in the Age of AI blog
2026-09-22Video how to set up bannerbear mcp in claude code blog
2026-09-22Chatgpt x bannerbear how podcasters can do more with less podcast or video

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page bannerbear.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Bannerbear

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bannerbear's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bannerbear, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bannerbear by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Bannerbear is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bannerbear, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.