Every category where a model named Creatopy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Creative automation platforms	Marketing	6%	6 of 109	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Creatopy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Creatopy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels2

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative9 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels2

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most companies with limited budgets, Canva Pro or Creatopy offer the best balance of affordability, ease of use, and functionality” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Creative automation · budget prompt · first choice

“The Best All-Rounder: Creatopy (formerly Creatomate) ... widely considered the sweet spot for the mid-market” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Creative automation · direct prompt · first choice

“Creatopy sits perfectly in the mid-market price-and-feature sweet spot.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Creative automation · direct prompt · first choice

“If you need a lower-cost, self-serve template/resizing tool without dedicated ad ops resources, The Brief / Creatopy is the commonly recommended entry point.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Creative automation · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Creatopy, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Creatopy was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Celtra18 of 332Compare →

AdCreative.ai17 of 332Not among the top eight

Smartly17 of 330Compare →

Canva16 of 336Compare →

Bannerflow15 of 333Compare →

Storyteq11 of 330Not among the top eight

Bannerbear10 of 330Not among the top eight

Marq Team8 of 331Compare →

The Brief7 of 330Compare →

Abyssale5 of 331Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Creatopy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 33 answers that named Creatopy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bannerflow.com19

creatify.ai19

viewst.com14

wireflow.ai12

adstellar.ai11

marq.com11

tryatria.com10

rocketium.ai9

cropink.com8

madgicx.com8

No domain is on file for Creatopy, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

bannerflow.com/blog/best-creative-automation-platforms-202619

creatify.ai/blog/creative-automation-tools-compared19

wireflow.ai/blog/best-creative-automation-software-tools-in-202611

marq.com/blog/creative-automation-tools9

viewst.com/best-creative-automation-platforms9

cropink.com/creative-automation-tools8

tryatria.com/blog/ad-creative-automation-platforms7

cflowapps.com/creative-automation-platform-tools6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Creatopy stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 1,600 a month (“creatopy”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 19 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 109 in creative automation

Segment leader

19%

Bannerflow

First choices: 5 across its categories
Named in: 33 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Creatopy

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Creatopy; a claim can dispute any of them.

The Brief / Creatopy 1

Follow Creatopy

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Creatopy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Creatopy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Creatopy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Creatopy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Creatopy, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.