Every category where a model named Viewst for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Creative automation platforms	Marketing	4%	9 of 109	0%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Viewst yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Viewst across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative11 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The platforms most often recommended by privacy-conscious marketing teams include Viewst, Bannerflow, Celtra, and Adobe Firefly Services” MiniMax M2.5 · Creative automation · negative prompt · first choice

“the best creative automation platform for a mid-market B2B company is Viewst” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Creative automation · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Viewst as the best fit” Kimi K2 · Creative automation · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If your main pain point is speeding up HTML5 display ad production ... choose Viewst” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Creative automation · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Viewst, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Viewst was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bannerflow26 of 285Compare →

Celtra24 of 284Compare →

Smartly20 of 281Compare →

The Brief19 of 284Compare →

Storyteq18 of 280Not among the top eight

Canva12 of 284Compare →

Cape.io11 of 280Not among the top eight

AdCreative.ai7 of 280Not among the top eight

Brandeploy7 of 280Not among the top eight

Marq Team7 of 280Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Viewst. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 28 answers that named Viewst and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bannerflow.com25

viewst.comYour site20

wireflow.ai15

marq.com14

creatify.ai13

rocketium.ai11

segwise.ai11

cflowapps.com8

g2.com8

tryatria.com8

113 of the 133 domain citations in answers naming Viewst came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bannerflow.com/blog/best-creative-automation-platforms-202624

wireflow.ai/blog/best-creative-automation-software-tools-in-202615

creatify.ai/blog/creative-automation-tools-compared13

marq.com/blog/creative-automation-tools12

segwise.ai/blog/creative-automation-tools-scaling-ad-production-202610

viewst.com/best-creative-automation-platforms9

cflowapps.com/creative-automation-platform-tools8

youngurbanproject.com/creative-automation-tools7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

viewst.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Viewst takes 4% of first choices and Bannerflow takes 19%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “creative automation platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best creative automation platform”

Searches for its name, Google: 1,000 a month (“viewst”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 2,872 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,157 · 46 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,443
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 9 of 109 in creative automation

Segment leader

19%

Bannerflow

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 28 answers
Its own site cited: in 28 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on viewst.com

444

subdomains included

Content

279

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	240	undated		Creative automation, SEO
Comparison	23	6	2026-10-05
Report or ebook	8	undated
Template or tool	3	undated
Glossary or explainer	3	undated
Case study	1	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated

Most recent

2026-10-05Viewst vs figma comparison
2026-10-05Viewst vs TheBrief (Creatopy): 2026 Comparison comparison
2026-10-05Viewst vs celtra comparison
2026-10-05Viewst vs canva comparison
2026-10-05Viewst vs bannerflow comparison
2026-10-05Viewst vs abyssale comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page viewst.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Viewst

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Viewst's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Viewst, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Viewst by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Viewst is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Viewst, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.