AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Adobe Audience Manager · October 2026 Edition
Adobe · 2 categories · Ranked

Adobe Audience Manager

65Judge labels
2First choices
40Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in DMP for enterprise buyers
Rank 158 of 159 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 57% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Adobe Audience Manager →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dmp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Adobe Audience Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Data management platformsGTM data and infrastructure0%158 of 15957%23criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Audience and consumer insights platformsMarketing0%96 of 1550%1under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19%

Movement

Since September 2026, Adobe Audience Manager held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · DMP · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 207 → 161 of 161
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 170 → 149 of 150
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 7 of 137

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
DMP0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 170 → 158 of 159
Audience insights0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 96 of 155, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Adobe Audience Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00033
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small00303
DeepSeek V4 Flash01023
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200022
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501113
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B02024

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels1
Paraphrase16 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labels1
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative65 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best For: Enterprise marketing teams already using Adobe products ... Adobe is steering new customers toward its Real-Time CDP” MiniMax M2.5 · DMP · comparative prompt · alternative
“Need audience segmentation, activation and media targeting for advertising \u2192 Adobe Audience Manager / Real-Time CDP” Muse Glimmer 30B · DMP · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Lotame Spherical or Adobe Audience Manager if your priority is audience building for programmatic” Muse Glimmer 30B · DMP · direct prompt · alternative
“Best if you specifically need a classic DMP for ad-tech workflows: Adobe Audience Manager.” GPT-5.4 mini · DMP · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Do not buy a traditional DMP... the traditional DMP market (historically dominated by players like Adobe Audience Manager, Salesforce Audience Studio, and Oracle’s defunct BlueKai) is virtually obsolete.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DMP · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“traditional enterprise Data Management Platforms (DMPs)—like Adobe Audience Manager or Salesforce Audience Studio—are not only highly expensive ... but are also becoming obsolete.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DMP · budget prompt · hard negative
“Traditional DMPs (like Adobe Audience Manager or Salesforce DMP)... are largely obsolete due to the deprecation of third-party cookies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DMP · direct prompt · hard negative
“you should avoid traditional, enterprise-grade Data Management Platforms (DMPs) like Adobe Audience Manager, Lotame, or Oracle CDK” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DMP · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Adobe Audience Manager, over the 65 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Audience Manager was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Segment29 of 659Not among the top eight
Lotame Spherical22 of 650Not among the top eight
Oracle BlueKai19 of 650Not among the top eight
Salesforce Data Cloud17 of 651Not among the top eight
Salesforce Audience Studio16 of 650Not among the top eight
Adobe Real-Time CDP13 of 653Not among the top eight
ZoomInfo13 of 653Not among the top eight
Hightouch12 of 654Not among the top eight
HubSpot Marketing Hub12 of 654Not among the top eight
Tealium Customer Data Hub12 of 653Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adobe Audience Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 65 answers that named Adobe Audience Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com32
us.fitgap.com31
cdp.com27
decentriq.com23
blog.hubspot.com20
improvado.io20
pipeline.zoominfo.com20
mailmodo.com18
techdogs.com17
matillion.com15

223 of the 223 domain citations in answers naming Adobe Audience Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Adobe Audience Manager stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
260 a month (“adobe audience manager”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
13 a month
Its own site
It sits on Adobe's site (adobe.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 158 of 159 in DMP
Segment leader
37%
Segment
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
65 answers
Its own site cited
in 62 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Adobe Audience Manager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Adobe Audience Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.
Adobe Audience Manager (AAM) 1

Follow Adobe Audience Manager

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Adobe is the company behind Adobe Audience Manager.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Website
adobe.com
Headquarters
San Jose, United States
Founded
1982
Employees
about 25,988 (2021)
Ownership
Public, ABS on London Stock Exchange

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Build audience profiles that you can use anywhere.
Certifications
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1Section 508 as published in 2017EN 301 549 Accessibility requirements suitable for public procurement of ICT products and services in Europe, - V2.1.2 (2018-08)
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Adobe Audience Manager's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: developer.adobe.com/audience-manager, adobe.com/products/adobeconnect/audience-engagement.html, developer.adobe.com/client-sdks/solution/adobe-audience-manager, adobe.com/accessibility/compliance/adobe-audience-manager-2019.html, helpx.adobe.com/customer-care-office-hours/audience-manager/AAM-Profile-merge-rule-3-1.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Audience Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Audience Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adobe Audience Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Adobe Audience Manager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Adobe Audience Manager, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adobe.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.