| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data management platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 16 of 159 | 37% | 19 | criticized challenger | ▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 3%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer data platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 7 of 61 | 38% | 37 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 140 of 140 | 48% | 23 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 26 of 142 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Audience and consumer insights platforms | Marketing | 0% | 49 of 155 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDP | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 7 of 61 |
| DMP | 2% | 3% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 3%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 16 of 159 |
| Identity | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 140 of 140 |
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 53 → 26 of 142 |
| Audience insights | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 49 of 155, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 10 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Salesforce Data Cloud or Segment by Twilio are the best choices” Mistral Small · DMP · direct prompt · first choice
“Adobe Real-Time CDP (B2B Edition) or Salesforce CDP are top choices” Mistral Small · CDP · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“It offers flexibility, but the quality of the result depends on data modeling and rule design; check processing cadence and consumption-based costs.” GPT-6 Luna · Identity · comparative prompt · alternative
“For mid-market B2B companies with $80K+ budgets and dedicated data resources, Salesforce Data Cloud integrates natively with Sales Cloud” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CDP · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“You should avoid these if you do not have an enterprise budget or IT headcount ... premium price tag and high complexity” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CDP · negative prompt · hard negative
“Who to avoid (or pause with): Adobe Analytics, Salesforce Data Cloud, or legacy versions of Oracle.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Customer intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pure enterprise like Salesforce Data Cloud or mParticle unless you have bigger budgets/resources.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Identity · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“these are enterprise tools starting at $100K+/year and are overkill for a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Identity · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 320 of the 339 answers that named Salesforce Data Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
883 of the 883 domain citations in answers naming Salesforce Data Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Salesforce Data Cloud's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: salesforce.com/data/demos/data-cloud, salesforce.com/kr/products/data-cloud, salesforce.com/marketing/data/cdp-vs-crm, salesforce.com/br/form/salesforce-cdp-analytics, salesforce.com/data/compare/data-cloud-vs-adobe-cdp. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce Data Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce Data Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Salesforce Data Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: