GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Buffer · September 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

Buffer

196Judge labels
36First choices
24Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
5Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
35% in Social media for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 59 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 44 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In social media · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Buffer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Social media managementMarketing20%2 of 5914%44accepted challenger
Content marketing platformsMarketing5%6 of 1590%11accepted challenger
Search and social advertising platformsMarketing2%18 of 13720%5under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 10%
Ecommerce marketingMarketing0%21 of 1540%5under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 36%
Mobile appsMarketing0%37 of 1360%2under 10 labels · led by Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Buffer yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Buffer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511316
GPT-5.4 mini13116
Gemini 3.5 Flash22004
Perplexity Sonar13105
Grok 4.1 Fast13318
Mistral Small15208
DeepSeek V4 Flash13116
Llama 4 Maverick02002
Qwen 3.7 Flash14117
Kimi K222004
GLM 4.7 FlashX32027
MiniMax M2.521104

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct23 labels5
Paraphrase22 labels5
Comparative38 labels12not counted in share
Budget-constrained67 labels26
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative36 labels7not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative196 labels in all, every segment counted; 36 of the 55 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Buffer (Free Plan): ... Best for: Solopreneurs and micro-businesses who only use 2 or 3 networks ... need a highly reliable, incredibly easy-to-use scheduler.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Social media · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Free Plan ... For most small businesses starting out, Buffer's free plan or Metricool offer the best balance of cost and functionality” Mistral Small · Social media · budget prompt · first choice
“the safest all-around pick is Buffer: it has one of the cheapest entry points, a free plan for up to 3 channels” Perplexity Sonar · Social media · budget prompt · first choice
“Buffer stands out for budget-conscious teams, offering simple publishing and analytics at a low entry price” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Paid ads · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Buffer is too basic for team monitoring.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Social media · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Falls short on team collaboration, social listening, and deep analytics, and you'll hit Buffer's limits fast if running complex campaigns across multiple brands” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Social media · negative prompt · soft negative
“Simpler, lighter option. May lack the advanced governance/features needed for a 500-person org” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Social media · scale prompt · soft negative
“Buffer — simpler, cheaper, but lighter on collaboration and analytics” GPT-5.4 mini · Social media · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Buffer, over the 196 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Buffer was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Hootsuite108 of 1966Not in the top three
Later69 of 1960Not in the top three
Metricool55 of 1964Not in the top three
SocialPilot46 of 1964Not in the top three
Zoho Social45 of 1964Not in the top three
Canva42 of 1961Not in the top three
Sendible39 of 1961Not in the top three
Sprinklr33 of 1968Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Buffer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 196 answers that named Buffer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

buffer.comYour site21
blog.hubspot.com14
planable.io13
thecmo.com13
zapier.com12
sproutsocial.com11
napoleoncat.com10
postiv.ai10
efficient.app9
sprinklr.com9

101 of the 122 domain citations in answers naming Buffer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Buffer.
Website
buffer.com

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Buffer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Buffer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at buffer.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.