GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Later · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Later

75Judge labels
1First choices
12Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Social media for small business buyers
Rank 12 of 59 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 24 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In social media · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Later for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Social media managementMarketing0%12 of 5912%24accepted challenger
Content marketing platformsMarketing0%120 of 15950%2under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30%
Search and social advertising platformsMarketing0%45 of 1370%2under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 10%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Later yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Later across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500112
GPT-5.4 mini01102
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00202
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash02024
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash03003
Kimi K202013
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.502204

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative23 labelsNone
Budget-constrained25 labels1
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative21 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative75 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Need visual planning for Instagram or similar channels? Choose Later” Perplexity Sonar · Social media · comparative prompt · alternative
“Later (if your focus is heavily visual/Instagram/TikTok)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Social media · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Later if Instagram/Pinterest is your main focus.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Social media · comparative prompt · alternative
“For visual content: Later (Instagram specialists)” Mistral Small · Social media · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platform support shrinking: No longer posts to X (Twitter), Bluesky, Mastodon, or Google Business Profile” Kimi K2 · Social media · negative prompt · hard negative
“Trustpilot rating is very low (~1.3–1.5/5), with 80%+ one-star reviews” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Later is less of a fit for text-first brands or B2B teams that rely on X (Twitter) for distribution” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Social media · negative prompt · soft negative
“Later (be cautious on billing)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Social media · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Later, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Later was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Buffer69 of 7528Not in the top three
Hootsuite52 of 755Not in the top three
Sprout Social45 of 754Not in the top three
Metricool36 of 754Not in the top three
SocialPilot27 of 754Not in the top three
Zoho Social26 of 750Not in the top three
Agorapulse23 of 750Not in the top three
Sendible23 of 750Not in the top three
Vista Social19 of 754Not in the top three
Sprinklr18 of 755Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Later. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 75 answers that named Later and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

buffer.com9
learn.g2.com6
zapier.com6
efficient.app5
sproutsocial.com5
blog.hootsuite.com4
napoleoncat.com4
planable.io4
blog.hubspot.com3
igmguru.com3

Forty-nine of the forty-nine domain citations in answers naming Later came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Later's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Later, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at later.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.