Every category where a model named Sendible for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Social media management	Marketing	2%	7 of 59	0%	23	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sendible yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sendible across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	1	4
Mistral Small	0	1	2	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	3	0	3
Kimi K2	0	1	2	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels1

Paraphrase6 labels1

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Sendible - an all-in-one platform for scheduling, monitoring, engagement, and reporting” Llama 4 Maverick · Social media · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Look instead for flat-rate or plan-based pricing (such as Sendible or Buffer) if you have a collaborative team.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Social media · negative prompt · alternative

“Sendible is a good option for an affordable all-in-one social media management app.” Llama 4 Maverick · Social media · comparative prompt · alternative

“Go SocialPilot or Sendible for value (flat rates, good for 10-50 accounts)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Social media · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sendible, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sendible was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Hootsuite42 of 514Not in the top three

Sprout Social41 of 5110Not in the top three

Buffer39 of 5113Not in the top three

Agorapulse30 of 515Not in the top three

Metricool24 of 515Not in the top three

SocialPilot24 of 514Not in the top three

Later23 of 510Not in the top three

Sprinklr19 of 515Not in the top three

Zoho Social18 of 510Not in the top three

Vista Social17 of 513Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sendible. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 51 answers that named Sendible and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zapier.com3

buffer.com2

dashsocial.com2

efficient.app2

embedsocial.com2

guideflow.com2

learn.g2.com2

linkedin.com2

napoleoncat.com2

planable.io2

Twenty-one of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Sendible came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

zapier.com/blog/best-social-media-management-tools3

buffer.com/resources/best-social-media-management-tools2

dashsocial.com/blog/social-media-management-tools2

efficient.app/best/social-media-management2

embedsocial.com/blog/best-social-media-management-tools2

guideflow.com/blog/best-social-media-management-tools2

learn.g2.com/best-social-media-management-tools2

linkedin.com/pulse/best-social-media-management-tools-2026-10-platforms-compared-kumar-jis2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Sendible.

Website: sendible.com
Headquarters: London, United Kingdom
Founded: 2009

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sendible's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sendible, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sendible.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.