Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 8 of 37
1 category · RankedSendible
31Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Social media for small business buyers
Rank 10 of 53 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Sendible →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 38
2%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market10 of 53
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise7 of 55
4%6 labels
under the label threshold
In social media · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Sendible for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social media management | Marketing | 0% | 10 of 53 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Sendible held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Social media · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 10 of 51
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 of 53, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social media | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 10 of 53 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Sendible across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Sendible across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels3
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“platforms like Agorapulse, Sendible, or later-stage reviews of Sprout Social tend to have fewer issues” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Social media · negative prompt · first choice
“For mid-sized agency collaboration & client approvals: Look at Planable or Sendible.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Social media · negative prompt · alternative
“Sendible offers best white-label customization for client-facing dashboards” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Social media · comparative prompt · alternative
“Sendible stands out for its client approval workflows” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Social media · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sendible, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sendible was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sendible, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sendible was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sendible. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named Sendible and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
buffer.com21
blog.hubspot.com14
blog.hootsuite.com12
linkedin.com11
make.com11
sendible.comYour site10
agorapulse.com9
socialpilot.co8
hootsuite.com7
zapier.com7
100 of the 110 domain citations in answers naming Sendible came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sendible.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sendible takes 0% of first choices and Sprout Social takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sendible.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sendible takes 0% of first choices and Sprout Social takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “social media management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best social media management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“sendible”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 29 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 74,061 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 10,263 · 330 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,524
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 10 of 53 in social media
Segment leader
30%
Sprout Social
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 31 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 31 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sendible.com
622
subdomains included
Content
519
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
49 · 8
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 428 | 12 | 2026-09-22 | Social media, SEO | |
| Case study | 42 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 26 | 2 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Comparison | 11 | 0 | 2026-06-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 0 | 2026-04-20 | Social media | |
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Joe zeplin sendible review blog
- 2026-09-21Linkedin algorithm blog
- 2026-09-15When is the best time to post on facebook report or ebook
- 2026-09-14Schedule posts to google business blog
- 2026-09-11Threads search indexing google traffic blog
- 2026-09-10Linkedin post seo google ranking llm entity recognition blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sendible.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Sendible
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Sendible.ShowHide
The company
Sendible.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- sendible.com
- Headquarters
- London, United Kingdom
- Founded
- 2009
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Sendible simplifies social media management for agencies, marketers, and multi-location brands—enabling scalable publishing, client collaboration, and ROI-focused reporting.
- For
- agencies, marketers, and multi-location brands
- Price stated
- Sendible offers 5 flexible pricing plans billed monthly (with a 15% discount available on annual billing). Unlimited users are included on all plans: Core ($35/mo), Plus ($99/mo), Premium ($199/mo), Elite ($299/mo), and Enterprise ($750/mo). sendible.com
- Starting price
- $35/mo sendible.com
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial sendible.com
- Integrations claimed
- 10 sendible.com/customers
- Customers named
- RE/MAX RealtronV FormationAmelia Rose MediaSo ContentedSphere Media MarketingTopodium GroupDigiTLCOlive and Milo
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Sendible's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sendible.com, sendible.com/pricing, sendible.com/features/sso, sendible.com/customers, sendible.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sendible's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sendible, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sendible by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Sendible is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sendible, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.